Help:ASET/Ideal image comparisons?

RDG238 · Sep 7, 2024

freddyboston said:
There is a D flawless Type 2A on the market.... Its in NYC like #3

My dealer cannot find this one. Also, when I try to type in the certificate it cannot be located.

Any ideas?

freddyboston · Sep 7, 2024

Its listed on IDEX

https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=2235069046&locale=en_US

theres a link to the type letter on GIA report check....

RDG238 · Sep 7, 2024

Dreamer_D said:
Can you call in 2 and 3 and see them in person? I think it is splitting hairs comparing those two with just these images at this point. I don’t think you will be able to tell them apart, but choosing with your eyes once you have narrowed it down by numbers (which you have done) is the best bet.

Thanks, I did post links for both 2.01 and 2.03 in the thread above which have videos, images, data etc.

caf · Sep 7, 2024

RDG238 said:
Thanks, I did post links for both 2.01 and 2.03 in the thread above which have videos, images, data etc.

She’s suggesting you view them both in person. Have your vendor get them both in so you may compare them and decide which is most pleasing to your eyes. At a certain point, it comes down to seeing them both with your own eyes.

Dreamer_D · Sep 7, 2024

RDG238 said:
Thanks, I did post links for both 2.01 and 2.03 in the thread above which have videos, images, data etc.

I saw those. Videos are not the same as seeing in person.

RDG238 · Sep 8, 2024

Thanks everyone - I will see if that is possible.

What are your thoughts on table size of 58 in the 2.01 vs the 56 in the 2.03 and the 2.07?

Some people prefer the larger table size option but others say stick with the 56 for more ideal cut.

Also, I noticed the 2.03 has star of 45 instead of 50-55 but maybe that is not as impactful?

The 2.07 seems to have the better numbers on paper but I am not sure if I can get it and if there are any other images available. Will know more on Monday.

Truly appreciate everyone’s help and input, I went from knowing absolutely nothing to knowing just a wee little bit so it’s awesome to have your input.

The 6 o’clock position of the 2.01 is strange.

freddyboston · Sep 8, 2024

You know what - the 2.03 is also a Type 2A
(see diamond type letter on GIA site)

https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=2496013530&locale=en_US

RDG238 · Sep 8, 2024

Yes! I believe the 2.01 is as well

So to summarize, the recommendation is to see them with my own eye if possible.

Otherwise, the community feels the 2.03 is better than 2,01 mainly because we do not understand what is going on under the table of the 2.01 in the ASET table but also because the 203 has a little better heart image and a little thicker arrows.

The 207 has a little better cut geometry. We have not seen any images yet other than videos.

There is an outstanding questions about the table size of 58 in the 2.01 versus the size of 56 in the 2.03 and 2.07, and the opinion of which is better.

Also, any concern with the 2.03 having a star of 45%

Dreamer_D · Sep 8, 2024

Table size works in concert with all the other characteristics of the diamond cut to produce a particular pattern and light play. So there is not an absolute rule here. That said, 58 is larger than I prefer in general. Most branded cuts are closer to 56. I personally prefer even smaller combined with a higher table, among other features. Since we all prefer 3 (56 table) over 2 (5

table anyway, it seems a moot question.

Dreamer_D · Sep 8, 2024

RDG238 said:
Also, any concern with the 2.03 having a star of 45%

The features all work in concert so it’s not really helpful to pull out individual proportions like this. But maybe @Karl_K can help us if he has time.

RDG238 · Sep 8, 2024

Awesome, thanks so much, pardon the pun but….you all ROCK!

It looks like I will be going with the 2.03 unless the dealer can acquire the 2.07 along with images for further evaluation!

newtojewels · Sep 8, 2024

RDG238 said:
Awesome, thanks so much, pardon the pun but….you all ROCK!

It looks like I will be going with the 2.03 unless the dealer can acquire the 2.07 along with images for further evaluation!

Be sure to share photos when it's all ready! Have you decided how you're setting it?

Karl_K · Sep 8, 2024

Dreamer_D said:
The features all work in concert so it’s not really helpful to pull out individual proportions like this. But maybe @Karl_K can help us if he has time.

Its fine.
Super busy weekend.

RDG238 · Sep 8, 2024

newtojewels said:
Be sure to share photos when it's all ready! Have you decided how you're setting it?

Most likely a simple white gold or platinum 4 prong solitaire with a hidden halo. Going for a simple, eloquent, classy look. not sure on the white versus platinum, maybe just stick with white gold since it’s easier to work with, both can be dipped, polished for free for a lifetime. Thoughts/suggestions?

newtojewels · Sep 8, 2024

RDG238 said:
Most likely a simple white gold or platinum 4 prong solitaire with a hidden halo. Going for a simple, eloquent, classy look. not sure on the white versus platinum, maybe just stick with white gold since it’s easier to work with, both can be dipped, polished for free for a lifetime. Thoughts/suggestions?

100% do platinum unless your jeweler says they prefer white gold. You don't need to dip it, it holds up better, it's more luxurious, and it's currently at a much better price ratio with gold than usual. Here's a thread, you can see the vote ratio: https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/platinum-vs-white-gold-cant-decide.278449/

Have you chosen a jeweler and have you seen their work on similar settings? A lot of people really can't do beautiful settings. It sounds like you're in NYC, Steven Kirsch would be a good option. His pieces are hand-forged and he's amazing at pave and has historically worked with outside stones.