Minous, I'm not sure my definition of a 'stand up guy' would be putting the gem back on the market without cleaning up the issue with Mahaha--with a full refund. Further, for the seller to negotiate a charge from Mahaha after receiving the stone and seeing that it was natural inclusions, not trauma externally, is not stand up behavior.... Clearly this vendor needs to make this right....... the sooner the better! Mahaha, please let us know if this vendor refunds you the amount you paid assuming it was damaged........
Based on the correspondence with him, yes it is.I don't understand - was it damaged or not?
Now the veil is stated as visible in only one position from the pavilion. ....
Was it always disclosed on the website since relisting it (the crack), if so the starter of this thread needs to hand over an apology. If it's only been disclosed since gemrite started posting here and people kept pointing out the dishonesty...well then that's just dishonest. You shouldn't need to be coerced into being honest.
Since I'm too lazy to find the website and look up the stone (this is a brand new website for me) likely I'll never know which above scenario it was. Oh well.
When it was originally relisted, the veil was disclosed but no crack was mentioned in the description. You can see the cached page from May 23 at http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...mrite.com/home/237-blue-sapphire-483-cts.html
The mention of the crack was added more recently. Here is the current page
http://gemrite.com/home/237-blue-sapphire-483-cts.html
I have no skin in this game, and hope that the situation could be resolved, unfortunately it seems like a lose-lose for both parties. But, the truth and facts are important, too.
It's a bit hard to follow this thread, but it sounds as if the stone was shipped in a gem jar, which was was then wrapped. If the stone was to be damaged during shipping, I would think that the gem jar would have been crushed or broken, but it seems it was not.
Either way, he fixed the ad so I'm satisfied with that.