shape
carat
color
clarity

Here''s my pain in the Asscher Cads

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Thanks Noobie, yes it will go sight unseen. I saw Diamondlil''s ring and it''s amazing!!!
Thanks FF. I''m going to call Pete soon.
 
Congrats on finally getting the cads!

I agree with less metal will be better. Is it just me or does the halo seem to make the actual stone look smaller? I think it is because of all that metal. The halo seems a little too big. It looks like it is overpowering the stone. Does anyone else see that? or is it just me?
 
Yes Milly I see that too. The stone needs some help as it is on the small side, but don''t want a monster of a halo to over power it too. It''s kind of a difficult problem.
 
0.92 is not small, it''s basically a carat. I think a smaller halo will make the stone look larger and will still allow the stone to shine on its own. Definitely go with a smaller halo. The cads show the halo with a lot of metal. That totally takes away the ring from being delicate. The gallery and profile looks awesome though, so beautiful!

Don''t worry, this ring will be a stunner. We just have to tweek it here and there. Beauty comes with hard work!
2.gif
 
Thanks Milly, I agree. I don''t want it to have those ridge bar thingys seperating the stones in the halo. I called Pete and he''s in a meeting. Ana what is the proper name for those bars???
 
Date: 9/14/2005 12:22:31 PM
Author: noobie
I think it''s awesome either way, with our without the ridges. Beautiful ring. I want a heads up when it''s close to being done since I want to see this thing in person. I need to go to Quest in the next couple of weeks.
Headed to Quest for any particular reason, Newbie? Any new baubles in the works?
31.gif
 
Date: 9/14/2005 12:49:03 PM
Author: noobie
No problem Kaleigh. I missed diamondlil''s amazing pear by an hour and was bummed. She picked it up before I got there. I guess Quest will ship yours sight unseen?
I was sorry I missed you too, Noobie. I was anxious to get back over the Wilson Bridge before the real traffic set in -- nearly crashed the car a few times staring down at my hand!! Plus, I hooked up with Nan in a grocery store parking lot just outside the beltway so she could get the first official inspection. That was a hoot!
 
Date: 9/14/2005 2:25:14 PM
Author: kaleigh
Thanks Milly, I agree. I don''t want it to have those ridge bar thingys seperating the stones in the halo. I called Pete and he''s in a meeting. Ana what is the proper name for those bars???
I see what you mean now. Yes, I would have him remove those bars in the corners of the halo. Maybe they can fit 2 diamonds on each corner now, and it will flow more continuously around the halo. Either way, it is going to be spectacular!!!!!!
 
Thanks Diamondlil, I don''t want those bars at all. I just want one continuous flow of diamonds in the halo. Just like the rings in those pics. I hope that won''t be too much of a problem for them????
 
Lisa, I''m SOOOOO LATE to the thread!!!!


I LOVE the CADS!!!!!!! I think they look gorgeous, and not too metal-y for me....they''re going to be great!!!!! I do agree with you though (and w/ what Ana pointed out) that a continuous "flow" of pave (like on Lovey''s) on the halo is going to probably be better than having those little metal "bars." Not that they''d be bad, but I agree w/ you.

The gallery is PERFECT! So excited!!!!!
36.gif
36.gif
36.gif
36.gif
 
Thanks Blueroses,
I just got off the phone with Rose. She is going to send me a cad image without the bars to see what I think. Then You or someone can post them and maybe put them side by side to see what everyone thinks. I did find out that the stones in the halo will be 1.3 mm, whatever that means????? Help!!!
33.gif
3.gif
 
Just PM''d you
2.gif
 
I just got the cads without the bars for the halo. Blueroses will post them in a minute or 2. The question is do you guys like the halo with the bars or without the bars??? Thanks for your help!!!!
1.gif
 
Ok folks, drumroll please...........................................................


The revised halo (w/o stones)

lisanewhalo.jpg
 
new halo WITH stones:

lisanewhalo2.JPG
 
The new cads side by side:

lisasrevisedcads.JPG
 
The side by side comparison of the old CADS vs. the new CADS. First w/ the stones:

lisacadscompare.JPG
 
Thanks Blueroses!!!! I know what I think, but want to see what everyone else has to say.
2.gif
 
And finally the w/o stones old and new CAD comparion side-by-side!!

lisacadscompare2.JPG
 
You got it, Kaleigh!!!! I think EITHER way is going to be dreamy, but my vote goes for the WITHOUT bars. But honestly, you can''t go wrong either way. Let me know if you want any other juxtopositions/collages posted!!
9.gif
9.gif
 
Thanks Blueroses, you did a great job. The stones in the halo will be 1.3 mm, or 1 pointers.
 
I vote for the WITHOUT BARS one too.
 
Date: 9/14/2005 4:20:53 PM
Author: blueroses
The side by side comparison of the old CADS vs. the new CADS. First w/ the stones:
I like it without the bars, but there seems to be an uneven no. of stones without the bars. If we look at the corners, there is one stone in each one, then there are three on the top and bottom, but four on the left and right.

Am I even explaining this right?
33.gif
 
I like the bars slightly better but both are kewl.
 
Date: 9/14/2005 4:28:45 PM
Author: Boom
Date: 9/14/2005 4:20:53 PM

Author: blueroses

The side by side comparison of the old CADS vs. the new CADS. First w/ the stones:
I like it without the bars, but there seems to be an uneven no. of stones without the bars. If we look at the corners, there is one stone in each one, then there are three on the top and bottom, but four on the left and right.


Am I even explaining this right?
33.gif

I see exactly what your are saying..and you are right. they added two stones...
 
I think I slightly prefer the bars like the Daniel K style. But ever so slightly. Both would be great. I understand what Boom is saying. It looks like they added one stone to take the place of the bars and spread it around the center stone.

OK ETA, I didn't count, but if Mrs Salvo says 2, I believe her.
 
I like the cad without the bars. Now what to say to Rose at Quest, do I say they are uneven??? How should I word it???
 
well, little things like having a equal # would be a must have for me. If they can''t do it for whatever reason, i.e. it would make the halo bigger or something, then I would like to change my vote to with the bars for the symmetry
1.gif
 
I think she meant one on each side...I think I like it better with out the bars. But that is prolly cuase I prefer more diamond and less metal. JMO. Either way it is going to be a stunning peice!
 
Date: 9/14/2005 4:39:04 PM
Author: kaleigh
I like the cad without the bars. Now what to say to Rose at Quest, do I say they are uneven??? How should I word it???

i would just ask her if there is a way to add two more stones so you have a balanced number of stones. 3 on the sides and two in the corners??

ETA: there might not be a way to do it b/c of the size of your stone...so they squeezed in two more diamonds to fill the deleted metal space or they would have to re-add the metal bars
34.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top