I recently purchased this centre diamond https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-di...i-color-vs1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-3185709 for this setting https://www.jamesallen.com/engageme...ment-ring-with-scroll-undergallery-item-41658). I think it looks fantastic (but what do I know, I have nothing to compare it to)
For comparison's sake, I also purchased this ring from Costco with the intent to return it (but the yellow gold version) https://www.costco.ca/Three-Stone-R...Wedding-Set-(1.00-ctw).product.100107204.html
Since the Costco one does not come with a GIA report or a cut grading, I was expecting the JA ring to blow the Costco one out of the water as far as visible light performance; however, to be honest, the Costco diamond actually seems to be very slightly more brilliant (from my untrained eye).
I am wondering if this is due to the following possible reasons:
-The Costco ring having slightly larger stones (flashes of light from the facets are simply more noticeable and not necessarily more brilliant?)
-The Costco ring by fluke actually has a better cut stone, (or the JA stone, despite having good proportions and HCA score of 1.0, is a weaker performer based on other diamond aspects)
-The JA setting is inhibiting some of the light return (the prongs on the JA stone are larger in diameter, therefore taking up more real estate on the diamond).
Or maybe I just suck at determining the intricacies of light performance with my naked eye.
I will post some pictures/videos, but do you have any suggestions for lighting conditions/patterns of movement to compare the rings under where the differences in cut would really be noticeable? Since cut is king, I was expecting the differences to be night and day. But to me, I barely notice a difference between the two rings.
Thanks,
Ben
For comparison's sake, I also purchased this ring from Costco with the intent to return it (but the yellow gold version) https://www.costco.ca/Three-Stone-R...Wedding-Set-(1.00-ctw).product.100107204.html
Since the Costco one does not come with a GIA report or a cut grading, I was expecting the JA ring to blow the Costco one out of the water as far as visible light performance; however, to be honest, the Costco diamond actually seems to be very slightly more brilliant (from my untrained eye).
I am wondering if this is due to the following possible reasons:
-The Costco ring having slightly larger stones (flashes of light from the facets are simply more noticeable and not necessarily more brilliant?)
-The Costco ring by fluke actually has a better cut stone, (or the JA stone, despite having good proportions and HCA score of 1.0, is a weaker performer based on other diamond aspects)
-The JA setting is inhibiting some of the light return (the prongs on the JA stone are larger in diameter, therefore taking up more real estate on the diamond).
Or maybe I just suck at determining the intricacies of light performance with my naked eye.
I will post some pictures/videos, but do you have any suggestions for lighting conditions/patterns of movement to compare the rings under where the differences in cut would really be noticeable? Since cut is king, I was expecting the differences to be night and day. But to me, I barely notice a difference between the two rings.
Thanks,
Ben