richie5120
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 34
Hi, Just to share, in my case I was not looking for an e-ring and neither was I looking for a home appliance. I was just looking for another diamond ring. If a vendor acknowledged my enquiry and say they''ll revert within the day, I expect the reply to come within the day instead of not responding until I prompt again. When the vendor did not say when they will respond, I waited one week to send a reminder. I don''t think "impatient" is applicable in my case.Date: 1/26/2007 1:14:17 PM
Author: Pandora II
Wow, people seem pretty impatient.
I was amazed when Wink answered my email the same day. I was fully prepared to wait a week for a reply.
If I have been promised a response by a certain day then I might be slightly annoyed, but I would never feel I was being ignored if I hadn''t heard in 2 days. I tend to be more about working with a particular person or company because I like their product or their way of doing things or just have a feeling I trust them - especially for an important and expensive purchase like jewellery.
I mean if it''s a vacuum cleaner - I just want one fast, but my e-ring I actually want to process to be slow enough that I don''t feel I''m just on some companies conveyor belt.
Maybe it''s just different expectations here in Europe.
I agree!!Date: 1/26/2007 11:09:22 PM
Author: devientdrow
Why is this thread now totally about if people think whiteflash is good or not? I know threads gets threadjacked here and there but no one was saying WF is a bad company or anything like that. Everytime I see this thread is longer I check it thinking maybe it''s hikerchick posting what happened with the resolution.
As I posted earlier, the picture taking did not yield pictures sharp enough to pick up the dings and such. I don''t have a camera expensive enough to pick up the problems. We have spoken to WF and have detailed and outlined all the issues, including the dozen or so "dings", the tilted center stone and mis-alinged head and the uneven cathedral. If you are gonna wait for the evidence as you put it, you might be waiting a long time. Myself and my BF can see all these things with our eyes and you are just gonna have to take my word for it. And, in the end if you choose not to trust what I am saying, well that is your choice.Date: 1/26/2007 11:23:50 PM
Author: Jelly
I agree!!Date: 1/26/2007 11:09:22 PM
Author: devientdrow
Why is this thread now totally about if people think whiteflash is good or not? I know threads gets threadjacked here and there but no one was saying WF is a bad company or anything like that. Everytime I see this thread is longer I check it thinking maybe it''s hikerchick posting what happened with the resolution.
I''m still waiting for pictures/evidence that this ring has ''AT LEAST a half dozen dings in the platinum'' and ''The center stone is set uneven.''
I''ve had a hard time keeping my mouth shut throughout this long thread, and am VERY curious to see what all the anxiety and stress is about!
Thank you . . . I hope so too. It has been a very stressful time and I am particularly sad that we are a having to be the exception to the WF is amazing rule . . . but hey, stuff happens and noone is perfect and if they are able to return the ring to us in an acceptable condition, THAT is really all we want.Date: 1/27/2007 12:13:50 AM
Author: DMBsGirl
hikerchick,
I''m so sorry that u are dealing with this. This should be a happy time and hopefully this all gets resolved quickly so u can enjoy the fact that u will soon be engaged to the man of your dreams!
I can''t see either of the things you mentioned - maybe I need an eye test lol!Date: 1/30/2007 3:28:33 PM
Author: Finding_Neverland
I don''t mean to be critical here, John/WF, as trust me I have seen far worse, but,......
I do see the problem with the prongs in the upper pictures. They are slightly off. Not ''spot on'' as others here would say.
And in the bottom views, the pic on the right does show the diamond slightly askew. Also, on that bottom right pic, I''m not sure if that''s a reflection or a tool mark on the shank toward the bottom of the channel set diamonds.
agreed lindsey.Date: 1/30/2007 4:00:54 PM
Author: *Lindsey*
I honestly don''t think it matters what any of us think about how the ring looks (even if the prongs do look off to me.) What''s important is that the ring is satisfactory to the BUYER -- and that is something that needs to be resolved between the buyer and the vendor.
Whiteflash has a great reputation, with great work, but they are not some magical jeweler incapable of ever making an error or having a dissatisfied customer. It''s a business!
Hikerchick, I hope that everything works out for you!
Date: 1/30/2007 4:16:25 PM
Author: belle
agreed lindsey.Date: 1/30/2007 4:00:54 PM
Author: *Lindsey*
I honestly don''t think it matters what any of us think about how the ring looks (even if the prongs do look off to me.) What''s important is that the ring is satisfactory to the BUYER -- and that is something that needs to be resolved between the buyer and the vendor.
Whiteflash has a great reputation, with great work, but they are not some magical jeweler incapable of ever making an error or having a dissatisfied customer. It''s a business!
Hikerchick, I hope that everything works out for you!
i have no doubt that wf will do everything they can to try and make hikerchick happy.
hope everything works out!
Date: 1/30/2007 4:37:37 PM
Author: decodelighted
Hmmm. I don''t wanna stir the pot but now that I see the ''style'' of setting we''re talking about - honestly I''ve never seen a version of that setting that turned out ''perfect''. Granted - I''ve only been to a few jewelry stores looking at stock settings & the myrid of pix that come & go through Pscope over the last couple years. It''s just that that peg head with side flying butress dealies is just RIPE for ASYMMETRY. It''s inherint in the design ... keeping in mind Hikerchick is a scientist & will be bothered by minute flaws ... I dunno. Is it too late to pick another style? If the ring is flawed & needs to be remade anyway ...
Date: 1/30/2007 5:11:14 PM
Author: hikerchick
Date: 1/30/2007 4:37:37 PM
Author: decodelighted
Hmmm. I don''t wanna stir the pot but now that I see the ''style'' of setting we''re talking about - honestly I''ve never seen a version of that setting that turned out ''perfect''. Granted - I''ve only been to a few jewelry stores looking at stock settings & the myrid of pix that come & go through Pscope over the last couple years. It''s just that that peg head with side flying butress dealies is just RIPE for ASYMMETRY. It''s inherint in the design ... keeping in mind Hikerchick is a scientist & will be bothered by minute flaws ... I dunno. Is it too late to pick another style? If the ring is flawed & needs to be remade anyway ...
I have seen an almost exact setting to this one in the jewelers building in Boston in more than one store, those settings cost about $300 to $500 LESS but we chose to go with WF because we wanted the diamond and the setting done by the same vendor to avoid problems. Those settings were beautifully polished and did not have issues with the head so I guess I disagree that this style of setting cannot be ''perfect''. The channel set sidestones is the setting that I want and WF has assured me that they will fix the problems and send it back in a condition we will be thrilled with and we are looking forward to this as we believe they can indeed work with us.
Also in speaking with the production manager Leon over the phone this afternoon, he informed me that when they inspected the setting cast/mold and found that it had problems with deterioration and this would explain a lot of the settings issues.
Also, as I said before the ring was BEAUTIFUL as long as you didn''t look at it too closely but I want something I can look at closely and still be thrilled with it.
In any case, I am glad others can see the issues, as they were readily visible to my boyfriend, myself and even my sister who knows NOTHING about jewelry or diamonds. However, my BF didn''t see the flaws in the pictures as he doesn''t have a trained eye for these things and so he couldn''t object to the ring before seeing it in person. I however could see the flaws in the pictures but by then it was too late . . . I don''t think you can always see things in pictures no matter the mag . . . the shine hides the dings pretty well, you can only see some of the ''dings'' in the pictures and not all of them . . . BF assumed they were just reflections until the ring arrived.
A BIG Thank you to Leon at WF for speaking with my BF last week and for being VERY professional on the phone with me today, I felt much better talking to Leon and having him tell me that there was indeed an issue with the mold and that they were going to remake and redo the ring.
Thanks once again to everyone who lent me support while I was freaking out.
Date: 2/7/2007 11:53:52 AM
Author: MWG
Hey HikerChick,
Did you get this issue with Whiteflash resolved???
I am currently speaking with Whiteflash and Leon about doing a custom design for my soon to be fiancee and I too, expect exceptional quality out of a custom ring. And of course, I dont want to have any problems either, but if I do, I want to know that Whiteflash will stand behind their work and get it done right.
Please post back and fill us in on the outcome.
Thanks for listening and GOOD LUCK
MWG
Date: 2/7/2007 1:18:07 PM
Author: MeddlingKids
This topic concerns me as well. I''m going to purchase a diamond from them and have it set in a Scott Kay I''m purchasing from another vendor. Then again, it sounds as though your setting is much more complicated than simply setting a center stone into the one I''m sending them. I hope everything works out, hiker. Oh, and I don''t blame you for being picky. I''m very particular about this sort of thing, and since it''s going to be around for a lifetime, you may as well ensure it''s as close to perfect as possible.
I don''t think he necessarily meant that WF was going to set the stone. I hope the stone is going to the SK vendor.Date: 2/7/2007 5:45:10 PM
Author: mrssalvo
Date: 2/7/2007 1:18:07 PM
Author: MeddlingKids
This topic concerns me as well. I''m going to purchase a diamond from them and have it set in a Scott Kay I''m purchasing from another vendor. Then again, it sounds as though your setting is much more complicated than simply setting a center stone into the one I''m sending them. I hope everything works out, hiker. Oh, and I don''t blame you for being picky. I''m very particular about this sort of thing, and since it''s going to be around for a lifetime, you may as well ensure it''s as close to perfect as possible.
meddlingkids, I''m sure your stone will be fine. Just curious as to why you decided to have WF set it into the scott kay setting rather than have the folks at scott kay set the stone?
looking forward to seeing your new ring hikerchick..