I called it in the first post!

[AGBF]

AGBF, when you say, "DF, for once look at the facts," it seems that you are saying DF has never done so, not just in this case. Maybe that was not your intent.

Of course, you can say whatever you want, and I can disagree. And visa versa.

I didn't mean to discuss what can be said on Pricescope. What can be said is exactly what what the owner, Andrey, and the moderator, Ella, say can be said. I was only telling you that it was legitimate for me to have an opinion as to Dancing Fire's sense of perspective on an issue and was not a blanket "put-down" of him as an ignoramus when I said I felt he didn't see the big picture or lacked historical perspective.

Now you are saying that if I say, in one posting, "Look at the facts!" I am calling Dancing Fire an ignoramus. Well, I'm not. If I had wanted to do so, I could have. I don't believe I ever have, but I may be wrong. He and I have been on here for a long time and he has certainly said some things that rise to the level of "extraordinarily stupid" in that time. But they were usually in threads about women's breasts or his daughters or some other, totally off-topic matter. And I have said some extremely stupid things in such threads, too.

 

[Dancing Fire]

April, hope you had some money on that! I didn't think it would be Trump.
KS, I'm addressing that article, which is an interesting read. So you are concerned about Trump's fascist tendencies. Have you no concern for Clinton's socialistic bent? I'm guessing no. It's all about what we think government's role should be.
KS and AGBF, there's no reason to assume that DF is uninformed. Disagreeing with you does not equal ignorance.

Welcome to the liberal forum. ... They are alway right about politics...

 

[Dancing Fire]

[quote="ksinger

Tilting at windmills Deb. DF knows exactly jack about anything more than about 15 years ago, and has nonexistent analysis skills. It's like talking to a wall.

[/quote]


That is something we both can agree on!...

 

[Dancing Fire]

KS and AGBF, there's no reason to assume that DF is uninformed. Disagreeing with you does not equal ignorance.

AnnaH, I do not think you are in any position know what I feel about how much total information Dancing Fire has acquired over the years. At best you can infer from what I wrote above that I feel he was not, in this case, looking at the big picture or looking at the question from a historical perspective. And it most certainly is my prerogative to have the opinion that Dancing Fire's postings do not see the big picture or do not take into account history!

AGBF

History?...Obama and Carter is still fighting over each other for the title of being the worst post WWII Prez...

 

[Dancing Fire]

AGBF, when you say, "DF, for once look at the facts," it seems that you are saying DF has never done so, not just in this case. Maybe that was not your intent.

Of course, you can say whatever you want, and I can disagree. And visa versa.

Now you are saying that if I say, in one posting, "Look at the facts!" I am calling Dancing Fire an ignoramus. Well, I'm not. If I had wanted to do so, I could have. I don't believe I ever have, but I may be wrong. He and I have been on here for a long time and he has certainly said some things that rise to the level of "extraordinarily stupid" in that time. But they were usually in threads about women's breasts or his daughters or some other, totally off-topic matter. And I have said some extremely stupid things in such threads, too.

Facts?? ...Here are some facts under Prez. Obama's watch.

Threw Israel/Netanyahu under the bus.
Let Putin poke his finger at his nose whenever he feel like it.
Fighting Mother Nature instead of ISIS.
Releasing dangerous terrorists from Gitmo.
Disastrous Iranian nuclear deal.
His Admin. cover up Benghazi to get re-elected in 2012.

The biggest spending Prez in history.
Median household income down since he became Prez.
Slow job growth only 160K new jobs created in April.
More Americans on welfare than ever.
Obamacare Disaster. The not so Affordable Care Act.

 

[ksinger]

AGBF, when you say, "DF, for once look at the facts," it seems that you are saying DF has never done so, not just in this case. Maybe that was not your intent.

Of course, you can say whatever you want, and I can disagree. And visa versa.

Now you are saying that if I say, in one posting, "Look at the facts!" I am calling Dancing Fire an ignoramus. Well, I'm not. If I had wanted to do so, I could have. I don't believe I ever have, but I may be wrong. He and I have been on here for a long time and he has certainly said some things that rise to the level of "extraordinarily stupid" in that time. But they were usually in threads about women's breasts or his daughters or some other, totally off-topic matter. And I have said some extremely stupid things in such threads, too.

Facts?? ...Here are some facts under Prez. Obama's watch.

Threw Israel/Netanyahu under the bus.
Let Putin poke his finger at his nose whenever he feel like it.
Fighting Mother Nature instead of ISIS.
Releasing dangerous terrorists from Gitmo.
Disastrous Iranian nuclear deal.
His Admin. cover up Benghazi to get re-elected in 2012.

The biggest spending Prez in history.
Median household income down since he became Prez.
Slow job growth only 160K new jobs created in April.
More Americans on welfare than ever.
Obamacare Disaster. The not so Affordable Care Act.

Ooo! A multi bumper sticker post!!

Elaborate on Putin's finger and Netanyahu's tire marks, and present numbers for the claim of "biggest spending president", or your obvious cut and paste from a previous post will be summarily dismissed this time too.

** Just for fun, since I like nuance so much, here is a FactCheck on the uncritical claim of highest spending. As usual, it's neither fish nor fowl, it's (wait for it) complicated.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-spending-inferno-or-not/

 

[AnnaH]

April, hope you had some money on that! I didn't think it would be Trump.
KS, I'm addressing that article, which is an interesting read. So you are concerned about Trump's fascist tendencies. Have you no concern for Clinton's socialistic bent? I'm guessing no. It's all about what we think government's role should be.
KS and AGBF, there's no reason to assume that DF is uninformed. Disagreeing with you does not equal ignorance.

Welcome to the liberal forum. ... They are alway right about politics...

That about sums it up. How could anyone think you are stupid?

 

[AnnaH]

April, ha! Yes, we need a break.
AGBF, when you say, "DF, for once look at the facts," it seems that you are saying DF has never done so, not just in this case. Maybe that was not your intent.
Of course, you can say whatever you want, and I can disagree. And visa versa.

DF is a stats man! By the way, anyone who might know or be concerned, where the HELL is JoCoJenn? Now that was a respectable debae when she stepped in. I'm all liberal over here going "whoa" at her pretty damn meaningful side of conservative things.

Meanwhile, Budweiser renamed itself "America." (For now.)
http://www.fastcodesign.com/3059681/budweiser-renames-its-beer-america

Which could be some sort of antithesis of Facebook's "now trending" "liberal" news items?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/technology/conservatives-accuse-facebook-of-political-bias.html?_r=0

ETA: typo stays because I love it!

Agree that it would be good to hear from JoCoJenn. Would be interesting to observe how respected conservatives are received.

 

[Ella]

Name calling is what got politics banned in the first place PSers. Please keep it civil and kind or it will surely be banned fully again soon.

Don't be the one that ruins it for everyone.

 

[AnnaH]

AGBF, when you say, "DF, for once look at the facts," it seems that you are saying DF has never done so, not just in this case. Maybe that was not your intent.

Of course, you can say whatever you want, and I can disagree. And visa versa.

I didn't mean to discuss what can be said on Pricescope. What can be said is exactly what what the owner, Andrey, and the moderator, Ella, say can be said. I was only telling you that it was legitimate for me to have an opinion as to Dancing Fire's sense of perspective on an issue and was not a blanket "put-down" of him as an ignoramus when I said I felt he didn't see the big picture or lacked historical perspective.

Now you are saying that if I say, in one posting, "Look at the facts!" I am calling Dancing Fire an ignoramus. Well, I'm not. If I had wanted to do so, I could have. I don't believe I ever have, but I may be wrong. He and I have been on here for a long time and he has certainly said some things that rise to the level of "extraordinarily stupid" in that time. But they were usually in threads about women's breasts or his daughters or some other, totally off-topic matter. And I have said some extremely stupid things in such threads, too.

Of course, it's fine to say, "Look at the facts." That's not what you said. Again, I accept that your intent was different than your words.
No need to keep repeating.
Online discourse isn't the best type of communication, as we all know. It is what it is.

 

[Dancing Fire]

AGBF, when you say, "DF, for once look at the facts," it seems that you are saying DF has never done so, not just in this case. Maybe that was not your intent.

Of course, you can say whatever you want, and I can disagree. And visa versa.

Now you are saying that if I say, in one posting, "Look at the facts!" I am calling Dancing Fire an ignoramus.

Been called worse!...

 

[AGBF]

AGBF, when you say, "DF, for once look at the facts," it seems that you are saying DF has never done so, not just in this case. Maybe that was not your intent.

Of course, you can say whatever you want, and I can disagree. And visa versa.

Now you are saying that if I say, in one posting, "Look at the facts!" I am calling Dancing Fire an ignoramus.

Been called worse!...

And you know that although I argue with you, I respect you, whatever other people may think or say. I did not call you that. Sometimes you are my only friend on the forum, when people are after "the liberals". You are always the one who chimes in and says that you disagree with the liberals, but that you like Deb. How could I resist that? You are my friend. The old timers here know that.

(((Dancing Fire)))
Deb

 

[Dancing Fire]

AGBF, when you say, "DF, for once look at the facts," it seems that you are saying DF has never done so, not just in this case. Maybe that was not your intent.

Of course, you can say whatever you want, and I can disagree. And visa versa.

Now you are saying that if I say, in one posting, "Look at the facts!" I am calling Dancing Fire an ignoramus.

Been called worse!...

And you know that although I argue with you, I respect you, whatever other people may think or say. I did not call you that. Sometimes you are my only friend on the forum, when people are after "the liberals". You are always the one who chimes in and says that you disagree with the liberals, but that you like Deb. How could I resist that? You are my friend. The old timers here know that.

(((Dancing Fire)))
Deb

Deb
No feelings my friend. I have THICK skins...