Exactly, so the negative comments about them seem unjustified. They graded based on what they could see.Date: 12/28/2006 5:47:50 PM
Author: Harriet
Toby refused to recommend another vendor to us. Btw, David graded it blind.
Unfortunately, Brian''s out of the office these couple of days.Date: 12/28/2006 6:01:32 PM
Author: SKR
Exactly, so the negative comments about them seem unjustified. They graded based on what they could see.Date: 12/28/2006 5:47:50 PM
Author: Harriet
Toby refused to recommend another vendor to us. Btw, David graded it blind.
I would be surprised if both of them got it wrong by two grades.
If Brian at WF has also graded it, then it makes the whole situation very confusing and maybe another opinion from the like of Dave Atlas is justified. Brian''s opinion is worth its weight on gold - despite being a vendor he says it like he sees it and I trust his view also. Somewhat baffling.
Date: 12/28/2006 6:00:34 PM
Author: Harriet
That''s why Wolf was surprised -- I think his masters were new, and he thinks AGS is the most stringent of the labs.
Date: 12/28/2006 6:02:10 PM
Author: Harriet
The master was smaller. Look, I''m not ruling out the possibility that my appraiser was himself mistaken. I''m merely shocked at the discrepancy.
I have no pretensions to expertise. As you point out, the appraiser must compensate for size. Thus, the shocking discrepancy still holds.Date: 12/28/2006 6:10:03 PM
Author: kenny
Harriet wrote, ''The master was smaller. Look, I''m not ruling out the possibility that my appraiser was himself mistaken. I''m merely shocked at the discrepancy.''
There may be no discrepancy if the maters were smaller.
IF you line up 10 diamonds all with the color I from 1 to 10 carats you will see more color as the stone gets larger.
That is how it is supposed to be.
More material, more color.
I''m sure that appraiser must know this, and have some way to compensate for size.
But for you to say it was next to an I and it was yellower means nothing if that other stone was smaller.
UnequivocallyDate: 12/28/2006 6:18:05 PM
Author: SKR
I would be surprised if two appraisers got it so wrong but I guess these things can happen - I mean diamond grading is not an exact science is it? Regardless, even if they did get it wrong, it doesnt mean their integrity is in question. They probably realised the crap would hit the fan as soon as they graded it two off the report but stuck to their opinion.
Did Toby also think it was a K ?
This may be the rub. Dave has imagem, but it doesn''t have the history, I can''t conceive, of the spectra2000.Date: 12/28/2006 5:35:21 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Then it sounds like to me she needs to use an appraiser with the machine.Date: 12/28/2006 5:33:18 PM
Author: strmrdr
possible but not likely..Brian also graded the stone he wouldn''t put his name on it if he didn''t think it was right.Date: 12/28/2006 5:27:05 PM
Author: Harriet
Is it possible AGS is mistaken?
spectral2000 results are nice in these cases because it backs up the appraiser.
just to be 100% clear its kewl your(wf) paying for it and there is nothing im my mind bad about ya all over it, but if the report is for her she needs to be the client.Date: 12/28/2006 6:21:03 PM
Author: JohnQuixote
We offered to send the diamond for another opinion at our expense because of the inconvenience Harriet has already experienced.Even if Harriet were to decide against this diamond we want outside eyes on it for our own record.
John,Date: 12/28/2006 6:21:03 PM
Author: JohnQuixote
Harriet is understandably upset. We are concerned on her behalf and will stand behind her 100%.
We offered to send the diamond for another opinion at our expense because of the inconvenience Harriet has already experienced.Even if Harriet were to decide against this diamond we want outside eyes on it for our own record.
There are two possible outcomes:
1. The first appraiser was having a bad day and the stone is an I.If Harriet wants to keep it we have encumbered all costs associated with her inconvenience.
2. The diamond was graded incorrectly by AGS.If so, we stand ready to do whatever Harriet wishes; send it back to AGS for re-grading, help her locate another, adjust the price accordingly or issue a refund.
In the big picture the nice thing about the AGS/GIA is that such discrepancies are rare. In fact, appraisers of premium diamonds often note apparent color and clarity higher than the lab grade. But right now we''re concerned with Harriet''s picture: The bottom line is that grading decisions are subjective ones, made by human beings.Mistakes can be made, either at the lab or by another professional.
Regardless, we will stand behind our customer.
WF says the other stone looks just like the one in question.Date: 12/28/2006 6:26:22 PM
Author: SKR
Get it apprasied by David Atlas and speak to Brian when he gets back. Brian is totally solid. Also in terms of H&As, I think WF are one of the best vendors around. It sounds like, regardless of DA''s view, you will now always think about the other appraisal. Have you considered getting the other I stone that''s on WF''s website? I have been nudging a friend of mine, who is also looking for a round diamond to speak to WF about this very stone.
kewl that you have the sas too :}Date: 12/28/2006 7:16:40 PM
Author: oldminer
If this diamond ends up coming to us for another look at the color we will use official GIA diamond master stones along with CZ''s we have calibrated with larger diamonds. Also, we own an SAS2000 Spectrophotometer which does color grading as well as any device available commercially today. I have immediate access to ImaGem equipment to get exacting CIE color coordinates, but while technically interesting, the color system used in the trade and in labs remains visual and subjective.
I have no axe to grind so we''ll give an expert opinion and the customer can take any action they deem correct. It seems WF is acting in good faith and we will, too. I am very concerned for the integrity of the diamond business and take these matters most seriously.
Date: 12/28/2006 8:11:10 PM
Author: Harriet
Thanks. It''s been a long search, and it was distressing to hear what today''s appraisers had to say.
Hi Harriet. Did you happen to see the survey done by PS regarding labs and pricing? This section may answer some of your questions about AGS: Color & Clarity. I''m not sure that enough diamonds were sampled to draw a solid conclusion, but it seems the trend is for AGS to be a little less strict than GIA on color.Date: 12/28/2006 5:35:50 PM
Author: Harriet
The appraiser had it next to an I, and it was yellower.