ephemery1
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2006
- Messages
- 1,724
First of all, I don''t think you ever have to apologize for revealing your honest feelings about something! If someone dared to tell you that your priorities were off, that would be them projecting THEIR priorities on to you... which would be completely unfair.
That said, I completely understand your feelings (despite not actually having my ring yet!)... and struggled with the size issue a bit myself when choosing a center stone. I liked both cushions and ovals, and felt guilty for leaning towards the oval because its spread was so much bigger! The truth is, you like what you like... for me, it was an aesthetic thing above all else... proportionally, I thought the shape and size of the larger oval looked better on my finger, and that was enough to settle it for me.
In your case, I do think your ring is stunning and certainly more eye-catching than 99% of the other rings you''d see on real (non-PS) people''s hands any given day. It is unique and classic all at once... and definitely a substantial size, comparatively speaking! Pairing a wedding band with it might give it that extra oomph to put you over the edge... but if not, keep in mind it''s not glued onto your finger for life. Wear it proudly and happily now... but somewhere down the line you can always consider something different/bigger, depending on what feels right to you at that time.
And when people say simple, I don''t think they''re always referring to the size... I usually focus more on the details and say something like "ooh very sparkly!" or "so white!" if it''s not a huge ring. But I''ve definitely been known to refer to large, well-cut stones in classic settings as "simple"... just meaning all my attention is drawn directly to the rock itself... definitely a compliment!
That said, I completely understand your feelings (despite not actually having my ring yet!)... and struggled with the size issue a bit myself when choosing a center stone. I liked both cushions and ovals, and felt guilty for leaning towards the oval because its spread was so much bigger! The truth is, you like what you like... for me, it was an aesthetic thing above all else... proportionally, I thought the shape and size of the larger oval looked better on my finger, and that was enough to settle it for me.
In your case, I do think your ring is stunning and certainly more eye-catching than 99% of the other rings you''d see on real (non-PS) people''s hands any given day. It is unique and classic all at once... and definitely a substantial size, comparatively speaking! Pairing a wedding band with it might give it that extra oomph to put you over the edge... but if not, keep in mind it''s not glued onto your finger for life. Wear it proudly and happily now... but somewhere down the line you can always consider something different/bigger, depending on what feels right to you at that time.
And when people say simple, I don''t think they''re always referring to the size... I usually focus more on the details and say something like "ooh very sparkly!" or "so white!" if it''s not a huge ring. But I''ve definitely been known to refer to large, well-cut stones in classic settings as "simple"... just meaning all my attention is drawn directly to the rock itself... definitely a compliment!