- Joined
- Mar 28, 2001
- Messages
- 6,341
No problem...burner I understand.Date: 8/23/2006 3:23:45 PM
Author: Rhino
John,
Thank you kindly for rehashing this thread and bringing closure. Admittedly I get easily distracted at times and put things on the burner.
Will you be at symposium?
Kind regards,
ah yes, this is the symposium they closed tours to get ready for... have fun guys!Date: 8/23/2006 3:39:21 PM
Author: JohnQuixote
No problem...burner I understand.Date: 8/23/2006 3:23:45 PM
Author: Rhino
John,
Thank you kindly for rehashing this thread and bringing closure. Admittedly I get easily distracted at times and put things on the burner.
Will you be at symposium?
Kind regards,
I''ll be at GIA from Saturday to Wednesday. Looking forward to it.
John,Date: 8/23/2006 3:08:59 PM
Author: JohnQuixote
Neil - I assume you''re replying to the original post from a while back? (edited: am I crazy, or was the OP not quoted in your post before?)
While I agree it''s important to check the numbers, we''ve had thousands of ideal diamonds graded using the DQR. It costs less than a DQD, and those savings can be reflected in the price offered to the customer.Date: 8/23/2006 2:55:05 PM
Author: denverappraiser
AGS has several types of reports that include a cut grade, in particular their main style of reporting called a Diamond Quality Document. Ideal cut stones will say ‘ideal’ in this section. They have some reports that deliberately exclude this information. The other main AGS document is similar and is called an Diamond Quality Report. This does not have the cut grade and it’s primary reason for existing is if the lab client doesn’t want the cut grading mentioned on the report. You’re pretty safe to assume that this means that it’s non-ideal if it has one of these.