- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
we got this guy. http://www.imdb.com/media/rm4041970176/tt0088247
he'll take care of those dirty politicians.
he'll take care of those dirty politicians.
Date: 12/10/2008 10:48:21 PM
Author: strmrdr
Hasn't been proven that he didn't have anything to do with it.
Date: 12/10/2008 10:48:21 PM
Author: strmrdr
Date: 12/10/2008 10:38:37 PM
Author: AGBF
R/A, you have no business being snide. President-elect Obama had nothing to do with the alleged crimes of the Illinois governor and does not need to defend himself against them. How dare you attempt to tarnish him? I suggest that instead of wasting your time attempting to malign President-elect Obama that you go post a lot of questions about the Illinois governor on a site for President Bush to answer. The questions would be equally relevant if put to him as they would be if put to President-elect Obama since neither man was implicated in any crime! And shame on you!!!
Deborah
Hasn''t been proven that he didn''t have anything to do with it.
They are both the product of the same Chicago political machine.
Obama has supported him on many occasions.
People can whine and cry all they want but there are some ties there, just how many isn''t known yet.
Deb, I''m seeing more and more of a real contempt for that concept of "innocent until proven guilty" these days... That seems a cause for a bit of alarm, to me, since it is just about the single most important underpinning of our legal system.Date: 12/11/2008 4:47:21 AM
Author: AGBF
Date: 12/10/2008 10:48:21 PM
Author: strmrdr
Hasn''t been proven that he didn''t have anything to do with it.
Uh...Storm? This is the United States. We never have to prove that we didn''t commit a crime. How would one go about proving such a thing anyway? But given that the Governor was calling him a ''motherf*cker'' and complaining that all Mr. Obama was offering was his gratitude, it certainly doesn''t sound as if they were in on anything together!!!
Deborah
I totally agree.... It has been getting worse for decades. So many people jump to conclusions based on the whimsiest allegations and evidence. Heck, even significant portions of the news industry lives by reporting allegations because "people want to know."Date: 12/11/2008 6:33:24 AM
Author: ksinger
Deb, I''m seeing more and more of a real contempt for that concept of ''innocent until proven guilty'' these days... That seems a cause for a bit of alarm, to me, since it is just about the single most important underpinning of our legal system.
Date: 12/11/2008 6:52:56 AM
Author: perry
I totally agree.... It has been getting worse for decades. So many people jump to conclusions based on the whimsiest allegations and evidence. Heck, even significant portions of the news industry lives by reporting allegations because ''people want to know.''Date: 12/11/2008 6:33:24 AM
Author: ksinger
Deb, I''m seeing more and more of a real contempt for that concept of ''innocent until proven guilty'' these days... That seems a cause for a bit of alarm, to me, since it is just about the single most important underpinning of our legal system.
Perry
Actually, I don''t presume anything about the Mr. Obama''s integrity out of the ordinary for how I look at public figures. It is a fair to ask questions. However, what bothers me is how people jump to conclusions based just on a question or an allegation (and often allegations are made as part of a smear campaing).Date: 12/11/2008 7:46:54 AM
Author: Rank Amateur
While I presume Obama is smart emough to kept himself clean from this guy''s dirt, there is plenty there to ask the questions. http://minx.cc/?post=279535 . One of the other websites I linked is supposedly Obama''s transition ask the tough questions website, but they won''t permit questions about Blago. Transparence and Change indeed!
Many Obama-ites think BHO has impeccable judgement and values (e.g. the RIGHT way in an earlier post). We will find out he is just a regular politician. He was one of Blago''s strategy guys for Blago''s gubernatorial election. He knows this guy VERY well and probably chose to do nothing all those years he witnessed his deplorable conduct - the smart thing for political gain in Chicago. Now that BHO doesn''t need Blago he is oh so bravely coming out and calling for him to step down. That''s really going out on a limb - after the Feds are after the guy. Too funny.
But nonetheless, expected.Date: 12/11/2008 4:50:00 AM
Author: rob09
Date: 12/10/2008 10:48:21 PM
Author: strmrdr
Date: 12/10/2008 10:38:37 PM
Author: AGBF
R/A, you have no business being snide. President-elect Obama had nothing to do with the alleged crimes of the Illinois governor and does not need to defend himself against them. How dare you attempt to tarnish him? I suggest that instead of wasting your time attempting to malign President-elect Obama that you go post a lot of questions about the Illinois governor on a site for President Bush to answer. The questions would be equally relevant if put to him as they would be if put to President-elect Obama since neither man was implicated in any crime! And shame on you!!!
Deborah
Hasn''t been proven that he didn''t have anything to do with it.
They are both the product of the same Chicago political machine.
Obama has supported him on many occasions.
People can whine and cry all they want but there are some ties there, just how many isn''t known yet.
Are Obama and Blago tied in some way? Of course. How could they not be??? And does it make you guilty if you are associated with someone who committed a crime? BTW, the US attorney said that Obama is not implicated in Blago''s wrongdoings. But I guess that is not proof. Ever heard about innocent until proven guilty??
I think that all of these insinuations are pure speculation at this point ... so pretty distateful and useless.
Date: 12/17/2008 12:43:04 PM
Author: Rank Amateur
What is it about politicians that makes them unable to come clean and state simple obvious truths?
politics as usual in the state of ILLDate: 12/18/2008 8:31:01 AM
Author: oshinbreez
Date: 12/17/2008 12:43:04 PM
Author: Rank Amateur
What is it about politicians that makes them unable to come clean and state simple obvious truths?
Here''s another interesting article.
Loves it....Date: 12/23/2008 6:44:06 PM
Author: starsapphire
Blago is just a pompous ass with a beaver on his head.
An internal review from Barack Obama''s transition team released Tuesday shows that the president-elect''s chief of staff had a number of conversations with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich and his top aide, but that there was ''no indication of inappropriate discussions'' regarding the governor''s alleged attempts to sell Obama''s U.S. Senate seat.
Craig, who conducted the internal review at Obama''s request, found that the president-elect had no contact with Blagojevich or any of his staff about the Senate seat he vacated to take over the presidency.
If the teacher already looked at the paper, and will be letting me know what the real grade is, I seriously doubt they would lie, yanno? I doubt that the PE and co. want to possibly face purjory, but I could be wrong!Date: 12/26/2008 3:46:44 PM
Author: Rank Amateur
Soooo. Obama's newly appointed attorney (GregCraig - bonus points to his Mom for syllabic efficiency) said that his new boss, the President-Elect, is clean? Seriously? Since when you do believe your kids when they grade their own papers?
I'm sure Obama is reasonably clean, but don't patronize us with the 'we looked into it ourselves and everything is okey dokey' crap. Obama's JUDGEMENT is the thing we should be questioning and why he would support such a turd (until it became politically impossible for him to do so). I'm talking about the Blago of several years ago, not the Senate seat in particular. Either Obama isn't astitute enough to pick up on the not-so subtle signals Blago was well-know for OR Obama turned a blind eye. Either way it doesn't speak much for his character or character judgement. Both of which one hopes the Pres has in spades.