fel
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 498
Hi,
So I am somewhat obsessed with star sapphires, and just bought a sliver ring by a rather well-known Mexican taxco artist, with a star sapphire that was represented to me as synthetic. I suspected it might be real, since this artist was known to work with beautiful gems. Per my GIA specialist, it is actually a real star sapphire, although he said not particularly valuable (I guess to him that means under $1000 or so). He didn't think I should bother with a formal GIA report, because that would cost $175.00. Can you tell me your thoughts on value and whether I should get a report? It is not clear from the picture, but the stone is quite translucent. The star looks murky in some lighting, but is clear and straight with good movement when viewed in direct sun or with a flashlight. Using my cell phone I was not able to get a good photo of the star because the phone shaded the sunlight, but you get an idea. The stone does have some weird color zoning -- bluer at the bottom than the rest.
Given that the ring itself by this artist is probably worth more than I paid (I spent under $200), I think I got a good deal. But I am curious why the GIA guy didn't think the star would come out to more value, given the size the fact that it is translucent, despite a rather shy star.
Thanks,
Fel

So I am somewhat obsessed with star sapphires, and just bought a sliver ring by a rather well-known Mexican taxco artist, with a star sapphire that was represented to me as synthetic. I suspected it might be real, since this artist was known to work with beautiful gems. Per my GIA specialist, it is actually a real star sapphire, although he said not particularly valuable (I guess to him that means under $1000 or so). He didn't think I should bother with a formal GIA report, because that would cost $175.00. Can you tell me your thoughts on value and whether I should get a report? It is not clear from the picture, but the stone is quite translucent. The star looks murky in some lighting, but is clear and straight with good movement when viewed in direct sun or with a flashlight. Using my cell phone I was not able to get a good photo of the star because the phone shaded the sunlight, but you get an idea. The stone does have some weird color zoning -- bluer at the bottom than the rest.
Given that the ring itself by this artist is probably worth more than I paid (I spent under $200), I think I got a good deal. But I am curious why the GIA guy didn't think the star would come out to more value, given the size the fact that it is translucent, despite a rather shy star.

Thanks,
Fel
