Blue
Blue
@whitewave
My precision cut Mozambique aquamarine for blue
Any "inclusions" or marks seen are smudges; its entirely clean. It's such a pure baby blue and a shape that I adore. Shes 6.35cts & 15.2x9.5x6.7mm
@whitewave
My precision cut Mozambique aquamarine for blue
Any "inclusions" or marks seen are smudges; its entirely clean. It's such a pure baby blue and a shape that I adore. Shes 6.35cts & 15.2x9.5x6.7mm
This is my favorite shade of aqua... it's a sort of powdery or watery (fitting!) blue, but still saturated, which I just adore. I, like @Daisys and Diamonds, am waiting impatiently to know the deets on how you'll set this beauty!
@Autumn in New England & @Daisys and Diamonds
It's a lovely elongated shape, the perfect size/dimensions for my hand personally, so I don't want to add a halo or any side stones that will change these face up dimensions, so I'd like to go for a very simple brushed matte bezel and band. Extremely simple & slightly more protective for more wear.
This stone represents my sweet son's birth, and so I'd imagine I'll wear it a bit more than my other rings! At first yellow gold was a given but after putting it next to unplated 14k white gold, it would look extremely icy/blingy, even with this settings simplicity.
What do you think, yellow or white gold? Rose is out if the picture as it's just all wrong for this baby blue.
Something like this but obviously on a larger scale..
Also, merci for your lovely comments you sweeties ❤
Wow that's a nearly 100% color change! Incredible!!
@LemonMoonLex It is lovely! I would go with yellow gold, or mixed yellow and white gold.
@Autumn in New England yes, those garnets are quite interesting. In mixed, regular light they are deep, dark red.
Indigo? I just received this cobalt spinel, it turned out darker than I had hoped. it has been horribly overcast here so maybe that’s why. It Is a moody stone. It looks nice in some lighting but is mostly stubbornly inky, even outdoors. Could you share your thoughts, please? Seriously considering returning it because to me a gem should look good across lighting conditoons
I just received this cobalt spinel, it turned out darker than I had hoped. it has been horribly overcast here so maybe that’s why. It Is a moody stone. It looks nice in some lighting but is mostly stubbornly inky, even outdoors. Could you share your thoughts, please?
@Mrs_Strizzle Thank you so much for sharing!, That helps, especially the comparison to your other spinel. Re: price, I paid a lot more for this one, so I guess it is not quite up to the mark,
@Crimson is it more often inky than not?
For me it would depend on how often it is dark! Cost would also be a factor! I have a darkish teal sapphire that I spent (I think) about $400 AUD on. I thought it was ok for the price as it was 50/50 in terms of whether it was dark or a glorious peacock teal. For that price I kept it!
If you spent a decent chunk though, I would expect better performance and return the stone! I bet that fabulous cuprian of yours is gorgeous in all lights!
@LemonMoonLex It is lovely! I would go with yellow gold, or mixed yellow and white gold.
@Autumn in New England yes, those garnets are quite interesting. In mixed, regular light they are deep, dark red.
Indigo? I just received this cobalt spinel, it turned out darker than I had hoped. it has been horribly overcast here so maybe that’s why. It Is a moody stone. It looks nice in some lighting but is mostly stubbornly inky, even outdoors. Could you share your thoughts, please? Seriously considering returning it because to me a gem should look good across lighting conditoons
@Avondale Thank you. Yes, it is a moody stone. The original four photos I posted are of the same stone. The one among the green leaves is how I wish it would look all the time but it seems to be closed and dark in most lighting conditions. The strange thing is that at night it seems to wake up and become a beautiful shimmering purple-indigo.I myself don't mind a moody stone, but the pictures you've posted look so different from each other it's difficult to gauge what's the actual colour you see with your eyes. Or are they all accurate and it's just that the stone can look that different depending on the light?
@ItsMainelyYou, Thank you for your frank evaluation. That is what I needed. Yes, this stone is from new Mahenge cobalt spinel deposit, and has the characteristic lamellar and line inclusions. It is fascinating under a loupe. It also colour- shifts. For me, it is like an artiste who occasionally comes out to perform a stunt, and then retires backstage for a long timeWas this the one we saw pictures of?
She's a nice dark blue.
Send her back, purely because they're asking a king's ransom. If it was 800 for the stone, sure, but not 800/ct. I'm sure they're marketing it as cobalt. It's a personal pet peeve, but normal for retail. It's why I haven't bought a spinel retail in forever. Everything is either Jedi, Mahenge or has cobalt! now- the trouble is many of them aren't near the color that command those prices, while charging for it anyway. I'm probably being stubborn to the fact that they will very quickly lose the advantage of any appreciable affordability.
Boo hiss!
@Autumn in New England & @Daisys and Diamonds
It's a lovely elongated shape, the perfect size/dimensions for my hand personally, so I don't want to add a halo or any side stones that will change these face up dimensions, so I'd like to go for a very simple brushed matte bezel and band. Extremely simple & slightly more protective for more wear.
This stone represents my sweet son's birth, and so I'd imagine I'll wear it a bit more than my other rings! At first yellow gold was a given but after putting it next to unplated 14k white gold, it would look extremely icy/blingy, even with this settings simplicity.
What do you think, yellow or white gold? Rose is out if the picture as it's just all wrong for this baby blue.
Something like this but obviously on a larger scale..
Also, merci for your lovely comments you sweeties ❤