Gypsy
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 40,225
Date: 9/6/2007 9:53:03 PM
Author: strmrdr
different versions of the sarin scanner can account for the slight difference. I think this is going to be a wonderful piece.
The sarin also has improved a whole bunch the last 2 years for measuring fancies too.
Date: 9/6/2007 10:23:31 PM
Author: denverappraiser
Thanks for all of the nice words Gypsy. It''s been a pleasure.
I upgraded my Sarin to the latest and greatest just yesterday.This was the first real stone on the new version. It may be that we''re comparing new numbers with the 4 year old GIA/sarin measurements but it''s equally likely to be my calibrations that are slightly out of whack. Maybe both. I''ll check it in the morning.
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver
Thank you Miranda!Date: 9/7/2007 12:41:37 PM
Author: decodelighted
Re-sizing??? Huh, what? Are you talking about the pictures or the existing e-ring setting! I just realized you''ll have an empty setting just BEGGING for a COLORED GEMSTONE!!
Thank you FG! High compliment from you lady!Date: 9/7/2007 1:13:49 PM
Author: FireGoddess
It is just going to be so gorgeous - the drawings take my breath away!!
We have a final sketch! You kinda need to view both of them together to get the full pictur-- the halo details are in the older picture. With the stone set up on the prongs... total setting height is going to be 9.6!!! (I had eight in my thread... but forgot the stone!).