- Joined
- Jun 10, 2013
- Messages
- 373
I like your spunk and spirit! Please keep us posted with plenty of photos when the stone arrives!
True... as stated on that web page re Gem Briefs & on the AGL price list I linked in post #18, origin is not included in a Gem Brief or a first-level Prestige Report. All Prestige Reports give an opinion as to stability of the clarity-enhancing treatment -- but the cheaper Gem Briefs do that as well
So far as I've seen since I started scrutinizing Friday, AGL reports the stability as a range in both Prestige Reports & Gem Briefs. Have yet to see anything other than "Very Good to Good" in emerald Prestige Reports or Gem Briefs. A Prestige Report will opine as to extent of treatment (as do GIA's reports on emeralds, priced cheaper than the basic Prestige Report), so that's a plus over its Gem Brief.
But I am disappointed that AGL isn't being as specific about emerald treatments as I used to think. Wonder if they will specifically call out Palma when that's detected?
But take a look at current-recent AGL Prestige Reports for emeralds & you'll see that treatments are classified as "traditional" or "modern." "Traditional" -- a Prestige Report tells you -- "may include various oils (such as Cedarwood oil) and waxes (such as Paraffin) as well as others." AGL uses "modern" to indicate the use of "polymer-type resins, singly or in combination with other types of fillers."