shape
carat
color
clarity

Looking for input/education on these chrysoberyl stones

Oh I was being dramatic -- it's not such a great story!

Got my wife a right-hand ring before I even knew there was a name for these things. It was maybe 15+ years ago. We had come across this all-original Deco one with a 3-ct unheated Ceylon sapphire flanked by bullet-shaped diamonds that she fell in love with. It was "expensive" at the time -- but an almost laughable bargain in retrospect. She wore it day-in, day-out for 10+ years until a prong broke. It was her "signature" piece of jewelry in our household but I don't think anyone else ever noticed it (it's pretty petite). I knew it was accumulating some abrasions and it's a fragile design to begin with -- but the jeweler was just horrified at the damage to the sapphire. I know I've posted this quote here before but he said something to the effect of: "It survived 100 years in near-perfect condition until you!" He really loves jewelry and jewelry history.

At the time of the prong re-tipping, he urged us to have the stone polished ("It hasn't been out of this mounting in 100 years!"). Don't get me wrong; he is a wonderful guy. But my wife was so shamed and stricken by the whole thing that she will not wear the ring. It's "too precious" now. It's not over-the-top by PS standards and she bought a few inexpensive rings to wear "in rotation" with it but this one floated back to the safe deposit box.

This is an "after" photo, worn backwards on one of my fingers:

Screen Shot 2023-02-14 at 10.23.22 PM.png

The color IRL is lighter and brighter than shown. The polishing -- which I was sort of opposed to but eventually succumbed to some vendor arm-twisting -- dropped it just below 3 ct (strike one) and we both think it lost a tiny bit of its amazing glow (our only glowy stone, so strike two). And I think the new and over-large prongs were designed with protection and not elegance in mind (strike three, I guess). And it rounded the contour from an almost-octagon to an oval-y cushion... But, I think it's still our kids' favorite and most iconic piece of "Mom jewelry."

It did lead me to completely re-think the permanence and "generational" quality of jewelry and I no longer browse with the great, great grandchildren in mind!

It is a good story :D The ring is so beautiful! I'm sorry your wife felt shamed. I feel like it would've ended up in similar shape after ten years with me :D I'm also looking for something I can wear day-in, day-out as a "signature." But maybe my outlook will change down the line, too.
 
I remember seeing YAG as 9.5 hardness from somewhere. Oops, that 9.5 must've been a typo on another website. At 8.5 it would be at the same hardness as chrysoberyl. So then the trade-off would be getting a natural chrysoberyl with a poorer cut vs a perfect precision-cut YAG.

That's okay, still good to know about YAG. Although if it's just as soft, I'd probably go with the less-perfect chrysoberyl.
 
Is there a certain carat weight or face-up dimensions you are seeking?

Are you open to preloved?

It's possible PSers may have a loose chrysoberyl they're ready to part with but haven't listed yet, perhaps a glowy greenish yellow square cushion-cut chryso facing up 6.5mm ...

I'd actually prefer pre-loved, whatever it ends up being. I told my partner the more haunted, the better :D No certain carat weight, but I think I would like it to be at least 6-6.5 mm lengthwise since I don't plan to have much else going on with the band. I also love the more rectangular cushion/radiant cuts.
 
YAG is a nice material for a gem stone. It's hardness is actually 8.5 so just under that of a sapphire, but the refractive index is higher at 1.8 vs 1.76 for sapphire and it has nice dispersion. In the rough, it's actually one of the more expensive materials, significantly more expensive than flame fusion sapphire, but less than pulled Czochralski sapphire and hydrothermal emerald, which is the most expensive.

Thanks for the info! Haven't even learned about refractive indices yet.
 
My mom’s ering diamond has two enormous chunks taken out of it and she broke the side diamond baguette in half. Even diamonds can get damaged if you are hard on your rings. Sapphires are prone to facet abrasion if worn a lot, so ALL gemstone rings must be taken care of, and not to be worn when doing chores, sleeping, or any activity where it can be damaged easily. Diamonds are not scratch-able, but they can chip.

This is a good reminder for me...
 
Do you like concave cuts? Here’s a nice chrysoberyl cut but Richard Homer, who’s well known for his concave cuts.
I agree with what everyone has said about durability, but I would still go with a colored gemstone if that’s what your heart wants. You want to be happy when you look at the ring on your hand everyday. As long as you have a ring you love and understand you might have to replace the center stone someday, or have the stone removed for a polish or repair, I would go for it!
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP

Featured Topics

Top