- Joined
- Apr 2, 2015
- Messages
- 2,339
Diamondseeker2006 I was surprised that this stone was not an ACA but I think just a tiny discrepancy in the hearts and it becomes an ES! I was pretty happy with the previous setting head, but the prongs on the new head are thinner and more fluid than the last Definitely a toss-up between this and the U-113 head!diamondseeker2006|1456606476|3996676 said:Carebear! Wow, what a gorgeous ring!!! The fact that that stone was ES shows how strict WF is on ACA specs because those images look pretty perfect to me! They also did a fabulous job with the new head and the ring looks brand new!
msop04|1456609237|3996699 said:Congratulations on your GORGEOUS new diamond!!!
Can you tell us more about your setting -- it's really nice!
Thank you Luckyhonu! If only my fingers were as thin as yours... instead they keep getting biggerluckyhonu|1473027234|4073260 said:I haven't been on PS in a while - got married, went travelling, moved......
But CareBear, I just saw your thread on your new ring from WF!!! Your ring is GORGEOUS!! CONGRATS!! It looks huge on your finger!
Thank you hathalove! To me, nothing beats a simple solitairehathalove|1473049778|4073306 said:What a beautiful classic! Seriously simple and oh so lovely
Wow this looks huge!CareBear|1456577282|3996533 said:Here are some hand shots I took under department store lighting. I didn't get a chance to download them off my phone and resize them until now.