JaneSmith
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2012
- Messages
- 1,589
JaneSmith|1363750862|3409235 said:These are probably going to be sideways. Sorry about that.
JaneSmith|1363759269|3409354 said:Continued.
My favourite. Oh my how I adore this ring! I lost the card out of my pocket that had the stats, but it was 1.6-1.7cts of rose cuts, and around .5 cts of rounds. Size 6, I think I'd need an 8 because of the 10mm width.
J'adore!![]()
JaneSmith|1363922856|3410860 said:GoldFish8, that big three stone was transitionals, I forgot to write that when I posted. Now I must say, I love large over-the-top rings, so keep that in mind when I write about this one. I loved it. I would happily wear it every day, and I do not have the job or lifestyle that would stereotypically come with such a large piece. It has quite the hand presence.(that emoticon may be 'cheeky', but to me it looks like hanging my tongue out drooling.)
The setting was a bit odd. It was too big for my 6 finger and the stones were set sky-high. Also, I did not care for the side stones having six prongs while the centre had four. The side stones where also angled a bit too much for my liking, and the total effect made it look at bit like a bug face. Googly eyes instead of pretty diamonds. But I think you could easily set these stones in a basic basket with four prongs for each stone and get a completely gorgeous ring. You would still have to set them high and angle the side stones a bit, just less than the current setting. The stones clearly are overhanging my ring finger, so you would have to know if that would bug you.
I'm looking for inspiration for a very big sparkly anniversary ring, hence this trip. I unfortunately came away with more ideas instead of narrowing down the ones I had!