absolut_blonde
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2008
- Messages
- 808
It''s the same for us. I wouldn''t mind a long-ish engagement. Maybe 12-18 months tops. Probably only 18 months if we get engaged, oh, right now. LOL. but I think he''d rather something in the range of 6-9 months. I''m not sure how we''ll throw together the big 200+ person wedding he wants on a shorter timeframe...Date: 5/7/2008 7:41:10 PM
Author: TheBigT
I wouldn''t mind a long engagement, but BF would prefer, as he put it, ''to get engaged and get married 3 days later.'' Hmph. I''ve informed him that it takes longer than that to get a dress and a cake and -- oh yeah! -- tell your guests about the wedding.
My engagement will be shorter than I would prefer (in the name of compromise). Because he''s getting up there in years and wants to have kids soon, and I''d like to be married for about a year first.
And, Bia, I hear ya on the NYC weddings being expensive. I''d rather put a down payment on an apartment!
Personally, I want a little while to enjoy being engaged without adding the stress of wedding planning into the mix. Not a super long time, even just a few months of having him as my ''fiance'' before everything gets kicked into high gear and we get busy with wedding madness. He differs a bit on that, though, and seems to think that engagement = wedding planning ASAP. (Or maybe he''s just afraid I''ll get all wedding obsessed as soon as I get the ring, which I doubt will happen but hey, ya never know! Never thought I''d be engagement crazed either!)