Needing help find the perfect RB

[strmrdr]

It might not be a total dog and might even look decent in person but there are better ones out there.
Patterns arent the best.
Id keep looking.

 

[in search]

One more ..

 

[in search]

Hmmm, I see what you mean....

One of the windmills looks much bigger than the rest, the upper right hand one.

Lovely shape though!

Ah well!

Back to the drawing board!

 

[Kaleigh]

Have you checked out www.goodoldgold.com yet?? I bought my asscher from them.

 

[in search]

Ok, so GOG sent this one:

I noticed this in another thread, which another PSer was looking at, well he was looking at a couple, and ended up getting the 1.24 F VS1...

BUT, he returned the 1.32 D VS1, which I think is nice as well.

Here it is: http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/2025 from this thread:

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/asscher-vs-royal-asscher.41703/

Now I know Storm mentioned of the three asschers Brantley posted, he ranked the 1.24 first and then the 1.32 second.

My question is, and I guess Storm can only answer this because he ranked them, but I am happy to here others opinions!, but why the 1.24 first and the 1.32 second?

I''d like to call this in to see, but I can''t help but question the flour. even though I know I guess flour. is personal preference, I don''t know if I prefer it or not! Will it be an issue or not, especially in a D? Does anyone have pix of MB flour. in a diamond, or know it may show more in an asscher????

Or am I guess being too picky????

 

[in search]

Hi Kaleigh!

Thanks for the tip!

As you can see, I''ve hit them up as well!

What do you think of this asscher?????

 

[strmrdr]

1.24 had slightly better patterns.
Both are kicken.
It wasn't a choice between bad diamonds.

I love fluorescence in diamonds as long as it don't make them oily looking which only happens with strong or higher and its very rare.