- Joined
- Apr 22, 2004
- Messages
- 38,363
In that case, I am ok with Yellow Gold instead of RG
I want a ruby that is not treated at all (if possible) I'm aware that might hike up the price.
OP wrote it here.
In that case, I am ok with Yellow Gold instead of RG
I want a ruby that is not treated at all (if possible) I'm aware that might hike up the price.
I know we try to be supportive on this forum but if I go on a car forum and say I'm looking for a late-model, low-miles, all-original, one-owner Ferrari -- and I have $10K to spend -- it's more helpful if someone says "You have Miata money" than if they share their Ferrari-buying tips, imo.
By definition, any ruby meeting the OP's criteria will be: a) terrible; or b) grossly misrepresented. With that price threshold, you are pretty much restricting your search to only unscrupulous vendors. Better to get a $1,000 mall-ring and not ask any questions about the "ruby."
Also, for a consumer not in the trade, custom-sourcing stones and custom-making rings is for the well-off. Or for people with incredibly esoteric needs that can not be met on the vintage market (Jedi spinel, cobalt spinel, etc., etc.) You will spend a quarter as much with a vintage piece. (I've done both, multiple times.)
If it must be ruby and it must be nice, I would start with some good vintage sites (Lang comes to mind), select all ruby gemstone rings, and sort on price from low to high.
Did OP ever say untreated? Or are we making assumptions? I think heat with clarity treatment is as close as she can get if she still wants money left in the budget for a ring.
however if she has said it’s a “birthstone ring” and your advise it to get a stone that isn’t her birthstone, I don’t think that’s necessary helpful.
If spinel is good enough for the Crown Jewels, it's probably good enough for the OP. Friend/family has red spinel instead of ruby as July birthstone ring. It's not like your SSN -- there is no law about which one you must use. There is no magical power of the birthstone. If it brings one great joy to wear an ugly birthstone ring vs. an attractive alternative, then the OP is under no obligation to take my suggestion.
I could see if it was someone else's birthstone -- spouse, child, beloved deceased relative.
Anyway, there is not gonna be a lot of ruby in that $1,000 1-ct ruby anyway.
It’s bad advise to tell her the one thing meaningful about her ring should change. Doesn’t matter if your “Friends Have spinel” or if the Crown Jewels are spinel.
I’m sorry if it hurts your feelings for someone to question your advice.
and it doesn’t matter if you see why it’s important to the op or not.
Diamonds are not rubies. It's up to you how much your friend's opinion matters to you. Enthusiast does not mean expert, and without a bigger budget and a lab report from AGL, GIA, GRS, or Lotus, you can only guess and cannot be certain. By you, I mean any of us on PriceScope. You need the requisite equipment to be sure what you have is as the vendor described, because it's impossible to tell the ruby's treatment just by pictures.
Ruby engagement rings that are of verifiable quality will cost you at least $5k for a 1 ct, so you are at the seller's mercy at your office point.
It doesn't look like the inclusions in 2 are surface reaching, and I don't think that they are distracting. You probably won't see the black inclusions in real life, as the photos are magnified.
Did OP ever say untreated? Or are we making assumptions? I think heat with clarity treatment is as close as she can get if she still wants money left in the budget for a ring.