- Joined
- Jun 29, 2008
- Messages
- 10,261
Yes. Rectangular is exactly the word I was looking for but had a complete blank! I''d have one cut (or buy one if possible) that was just a little bit slimmer than the width at the top and bottom of the shank - does that make sense?Date: 1/13/2009 4:00:50 PM
Author: mercoledi
Date: 1/13/2009 3:42:01 PM
Author: LovingDiamonds
LOVE LOVE LOVE that setting!
I would be tempted to put a lovely green tourmaline long slim octagon cut, lengthwise (so there are spaces at the sides on the widest part of the shank (the middle of the ring on the right and left) which would mean removing those claws (or just having them as decoration as they''re a very pretty shape and adding a claw at the top and bottom (not sure if there are any on the top and bottom). OMG that makes me drool just thinking about it!
Thanks, it''s really lovely in person! I love all of the detail.
So you mean a mostly rectangular tourmaline? There are prongs (same engraved double ribbon prongs) on the top and bottom. I''ve even seen tourmalines cut into a similar shape like this one, though that one in particular has a whole lot of extinction going on. Hmm, I''ll think on that. I think dark is definitely the way to go.