Please help me on the cut

[bluemoon2]

How do you think the light performance based on the spce on those stones?
Super great?

1. 54.5%, 61.7%, 34.0, 40.8, star 51%, lower gridle 77%
2. 57%, 61.1%, 34.2, 40.5, star 55%, lower gridle 75%

Thanks!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

#1 has potential but you need the magnified image of the stone and the idealscope image. The second stone has a pavilion angle that doesn't go well with the crown angle and I would not be interested in that one.

 

[04diamond<3]

How do you think the light performance based on the spce on those stones?
Super great?

1. 54.5%, 61.7%, 34.0, 40.8, star 51%, lower gridle 77%
2. 57%, 61.1%, 34.2, 40.5, star 55%, lower gridle 75%

Thanks!

Well the first stone with the 54.5 table scored a 1.0 on the HCA but the second one scored a .5 on the HCA! So I think they're both great and it'd depend on which idealscope looked better. Personally, I like smaller tables. But I don't think you could go wrong with either stone.

 

[JulieN]

AGS 0?

 

[bluemoon2]

#1 has potential but you need the magnified image of the stone and the idealscope image. The second stone has a pavilion angle that doesn't go well with the crown angle and I would not be interested in that one.

Thanks, diamondseeker for sharing your thought. I have forgot what I learned at PS before. Now I can only input spec into HCA to get some idea. Do not have IS image for either of them. I am looking for a pair.

 

[bluemoon2]

[quote="04diamond<3|1360636287|3377993]
Well the first stone with the 54.5 table scored a 1.0 on the HCA but the second one scored a .5 on the HCA! So I think they're both great and it'd depend on which idealscope looked better. Personally, I like smaller tables. But I don't think you could go wrong with either stone.[/quote]

Thanks, 04diamond. HCA seems to be fine. I do not have their IS images.

JulieN, it's AGS 0.

 

[04diamond<3]

[quote="04diamond<3|1360636287|3377993]
Well the first stone with the 54.5 table scored a 1.0 on the HCA but the second one scored a .5 on the HCA! So I think they're both great and it'd depend on which idealscope looked better. Personally, I like smaller tables. But I don't think you could go wrong with either stone.

Thanks, 04diamond. HCA seems to be fine. I do not have their IS images.

JulieN, it's AGS 0.[/quote][/quote]

If it's AGS 0, then I'd say definitely for the first stone! If this is for a pair then they're both good stones.