Please help with 3 diamonds

[wsjman]

These are all round, i color, si, and ideal cut. Thanks for any feedback

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Can't tell enough just from these pics, except the second one looks like it has leakage and I'd eliminate it. The first stone appears to be tilted so there isn't really a head on shot. You'll need idealscope images, if possible. Otherwise give us alll the numbers off the lab report.

 

[sakari_8]

Provide us with some more detailed information so that we can guide you in the right direction...

 

[wsjman]

1.15 carat, cut excellent, i color, si clarity, 62.5 depth, 56 table, excellent polish and sym, measurements: 6.68x6.70x4.18, $4850

1.12 carat, excellent, i, si,62.3,57, excellent, excellent, 6.62x6.65x4.14 $4750

1.17, excellent,i, si, 62.7, 56, very good polish, excelleny sym, 6.69x6.71x4.2 $4500

All gia certified

 

[04diamond<3]

First picture is taken improperly so we can't even see what it looks like. Second picture, I'm not a fan of because of the inclusion on the top and center. And the third picture looks like it should be an SI2 or an I1....a bit too dirty for me. And as mentioned, we need far more information on the stones to tell you anything you'd want to know (like how well they perform). We need:

Depth %:
Table %
Pavillion angle:
Crown angle:

Ok, just saw your post. 1 & 3 are too deep you should stay under 62.4 most of us prefer less than that...number two has potential, but you'd need an idealscope so we can see how much leakage if any.

 

[yssie]

Post one or more of these three:

-ALL the information on the reports - all the numbers on the proportions diagrams, any comments in the proportions diagrams or in the comments sections under the cut grades, and the plot diagrams

-The GIA report number and exact carat weight of each stone (x.xx)

-Clear face-ups of stones 1 and 3 along with girdle, comments, and plot diagrams (we can extrapolate table/pav/crown from the face-ups).


From just the info and pics provided I'd scratch #2 (table reflection for table size indicates deeper pav).. #3 IMO has promise (depending on girdle and a better face-up).

 

[wsjman]

Thanks all! Im at work and posting on my phone. Ill post all the info tonight.

 

[wsjman]

Gia Reports are attached for the 3

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Honestly, I am not sure I would buy any of these. For one thing, I wouldn't go below 62.3 on depth and that only leaves one stone, and I think that one has leakage. But if I had to pick one, I guess it would be #3. I am not wild about it's inclusions or depth, though.