ilovethiswebsite
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2008
- Messages
- 1,788
Date: 8/17/2009 7:42:29 AM
Author: makemepretty
Well, I think people who need prenups aren't in it for the long haul. A prenup is only beneficial if you are going to get divorced, what a nice way to start a marriage.
I'm old fashioned. Think '50's housewife in a 38 year old body. You only marry someone because you LOVE them. Marriage is HARD and a lot of people getting married don't expect it to be. When you keep your maiden name you're not really committing to the marriage either. It's hard on children too, plus it p*sses me off when I'm doing Christmas cards and I can't put Mr. & Mrs. Last Name. ;0)
lol. I am not following the logic here... Probably because your argument is illogical.
I don't understand how keeping one's maiden name has anything to do with commitment to a relationship, or how it could possibly be hard on the children. I am not a feminist but I do believe a woman is a person for 20+ years before getting married, and taking on her husband's last name or identity and forgetting her 'roots' can be hard for some (me included). I took on my husband's last name and kept my maiden name as well... Every single girl I know who has gotten married thus far has done the same... Then again we are all pretty well educated, professional and liberal woman who value our own self identity... not 50's housewives...
Given your argument then, shouldn't the husband who doesn't adopt their wife's last name also be less committed? Or is your argument gender biased?
As for the prenup - that is an extremely personal decision which makes sense to some based on their personal financial situation. I think to make a blanket statement such as it is right or wrong is unreasonable.