- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 5,083
part gypsy said:I disagree with the first part of your quote "at the core of it is a generation seriously lacking empahty as compared to previous generations" but do agree "much of the blame for that may be placed right back at the feet of my generation"
No worries, I'm not offended; I'm genx so neither baby boomer nor gen y but I know people from both and as a generalizations go, I would say in the contest of self-centeredness and entitledness baby boomers wins hands down. The biggest thing I would say is, that young people growing up today live in a different world than the world the baby boomers did. These kids grow up fast, and in front of the whole world.
Even in the article you quote college students today also scored highest in past 30 years in agreeing with statement that people who need help should be helped. How do you explain that if at their core, these people lack empathy? Isn't that what empathy is about? But no one wants to be a sucker and the social norms of what is an appropriate thing to ape is different than it was. I'm a researcher and I can find more than one explanation why current respondents answer differently on an empathy quize than people did 30 years ago.
I got a chuckle out of the above highlight. Lessee...you disagree that there might be anything wrong with gen Y, but still, my generation is to blame for whatever....isn't...wrong with them. It really doesn't compute. And to a great degree it confirms the animus I've observed in overhearing people from gen Y bitterly and blanketly blame my generation for EVERYTHING. It's OK though. One day, likely when I'm dead or don't care anymore, history will be judging gen Y's choices, and while things will be different, they will also be the same, in that that generation too, will have failed of its promise, and have collective sins to answer for.
I'd be genuinely curious to know what is that social norm that it is now "appropriate to ape". I thought that the positive assessment (and oddly I suspect no gen Y-er reading this will get their nose out of joint about THIS generalization - positive generalizations are generally always agreed with. Amazing how that works) of gen Y was that it was supposed to be THE most confident generation so far. Wouldn't that confidence include NOT responding like a lemming on a research survey and giving what you thought was expected, rather than what you really thought?
And just a note on generations - my husband and I argue often over what the "baby boom" generation actually is. Everything I've ever read says post WWII to 1964, but he contends that it ended mid-50s. So I did some sleuthing, and found the term "generation Jones", supposedly from 1954 to 1965. It's kind of a generation lost in space I guess - not quite true baby boom and yet not quite true gen X either. Dare I say the trite old phrase, it was a "generation different from the ones before". We were young adults when we witnessed the rise of computers - so we grew up like boomers, with nothing but maybe a TV (black and white quite likely) and yet were young enough to embrace and to keep up, at least at first, with the acceleration of technology. Personally, I still probably identify more with the boomers than the X-ers, and I'm not quite sure why I would feel that way. Personal leanings more than anything. I still value something handmade, over a new gadget any day, and perhaps that is the defining characteristic for me. I WORK in IT, and yet....I still have not wholeheartedly and completely embraced all technology. That foot-in-both-worlds dichotomy and discomfort seems to be a hallmark of my generation. We have the savvy to use technology, but resist because we remember that life CAN be lived quite nicely without it.
Generation Jones has a few good reasons to be suspicious of technology
http://www.mlive.com/communitynewsp...f/2009/04/generation_jones_has_good_reas.html