colorluvr
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 1,870
Long post - thanks for your patience in reading this (if you do) :
I have two yellow sapphires, one unheated (I hope) and one that is heated but doesn't show signs of BE heating to a GG under her microscope (boy, did I have microscope envy
) I added the caveat of the GG looking at the stone under her microscope because I KNOW the only way I'll know for sure is with an AGL report, but it was encouraging for her to tell me there weren't any "obvious" signs of treatment beyond traditional heating and the vendor swore up and down it wasn't BE heated....
So, on to my questions for those of you who have used AGL for sapphires.
The unheated sapphire was verified unheated in writing by the GG that was the original vendor and by a third party GG that I hired for a verbal that told me that she felt comfortable that the stone was unheated.
I am going to send it to AGL anyway to get a gembrief so I have the certificate as a back that up for insurance and if I ever sell it (which I hope I don't ever have to). My question is this: What would I gain from a Prestige report over the gembrief if I plan on keeping the sapphire?
For the heated sapphire, I was thinking of just asking for the minimum necessary to verify whether or not it's had treatment beyond traditional heating. I may sell this sapphire (I bought it before I found the unheated one) so my goal is to substantiate what it is to a prospective buyer as much as for my own knowledge. What would I gain buy asking for a prestige report from the getgo, as opposed to asking for a gembrief, knowing that I may need to pay extra if necessary to verify treatment (or lack of)...
Hope these questions make sense, but my goal is to not spend more money than necessary, but I don't want to try to do it on the cheap and then discover I would have been better off spending a bit more money on the reports. They are both supposed to be Ceylon sapphires if that makes any difference, but I don't know if spending extra money on origin makes any sense.
They are both in the 4.5 to 5.5ct range.
Thanks!
I have two yellow sapphires, one unheated (I hope) and one that is heated but doesn't show signs of BE heating to a GG under her microscope (boy, did I have microscope envy

So, on to my questions for those of you who have used AGL for sapphires.
The unheated sapphire was verified unheated in writing by the GG that was the original vendor and by a third party GG that I hired for a verbal that told me that she felt comfortable that the stone was unheated.
I am going to send it to AGL anyway to get a gembrief so I have the certificate as a back that up for insurance and if I ever sell it (which I hope I don't ever have to). My question is this: What would I gain from a Prestige report over the gembrief if I plan on keeping the sapphire?
For the heated sapphire, I was thinking of just asking for the minimum necessary to verify whether or not it's had treatment beyond traditional heating. I may sell this sapphire (I bought it before I found the unheated one) so my goal is to substantiate what it is to a prospective buyer as much as for my own knowledge. What would I gain buy asking for a prestige report from the getgo, as opposed to asking for a gembrief, knowing that I may need to pay extra if necessary to verify treatment (or lack of)...
Hope these questions make sense, but my goal is to not spend more money than necessary, but I don't want to try to do it on the cheap and then discover I would have been better off spending a bit more money on the reports. They are both supposed to be Ceylon sapphires if that makes any difference, but I don't know if spending extra money on origin makes any sense.
They are both in the 4.5 to 5.5ct range.
Thanks!