Dougsgirl
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2012
- Messages
- 318
Hi Everyone...
I have a dilemma and need some advice...
I have never insured a piece of jewelry before. My new ring is the first piece I've ever owned that is worth enough that it wouldn't be covered under my home owner's policy. My insurance agent told me I needed to have the rings appraised before they could be insured. We plan to insure them for replacement value.
So, last week, as soon as my rings were finished, my jeweler (Greenlake) sent them to the appraiser that that they use. This is an independent appraiser, not one who works for them. I paid $150 to have both of my new rings appraised, and I never spoke to the appraiser. I got the rings shipped to me, then yesterday the appraisal report arrived in the mail. It is a very official document, and the appraiser appears to have very solid credentials.
It is directly stated that the purpose of the appraisal is for insurance purposes, and to determine "replacement value" for the rings should something happen to them. It states that "Replacement cost, new, is the cost necessary to replace the item being appraised with new items of like kind, quality and utility. This definition assumes that an exact substitute can be found for the property being appraised."
Here's the problem...
The appraisal for my E-ring came back with a "Retail replacement cost, New" of over $6,000 less than what I just paid for it!
As a matter of fact... The assumed "value" of the ring came back $1000 less than what I paid for the diamond alone!
And so, obviously, there is NO WAY I could replace my ring for the amount of money they are saying it's worth.
This is what I think happened, and I don't know how to address it...
In the description of my ring it calls my diamond a "Cushion Brilliant", and it gives all of the specs for my stone. The problem is that my stone is not JUST a cushion brilliant, it is an AVC (August Vintage Cushion), which most of you know is a proprietary cut that is only sold by one manufacturer and is a LOT more expensive than a regular "cushion brilliant". When I did a James Allen search for a cushion diamond of my size, color and clarity... the results came back with prices that were close to HALF of what I paid for my AVC. ($8k-ish for the JA stones, my AVC was over $15k)
So, I think the appraiser (who is an Independent Certified Gemologist Appraiser (AGS), and a Graduate Gemologist (GIA) ) is appraising my ring based on the current prices for "average" cushion-cut diamonds.
How do I tell her... "Hey, you got this wrong. My ring is a "special" cut, which I did a lot of research on and paid more for intentionally because it was what I wanted. And so for a true "replacement value" I need at least another $8k tacked onto this number!"
She is the professional. I have about 5 minutes of "internet knowledge" surrounding diamond cuts and quality. She is a gemologist! Is she just going to laugh at me??
Is an AVC really no different that any other "cushion brilliant" when it comes to insurance appraisals? All I know is I can't replace my ring for the value they gave me.
Oh... and one more thing...
The appraisal for my second ring (the wedding band) came back fairly accurately... except for one small detail... The description says under "Mounting"... "Style: The ring is a five stone band style that features five Round Brilliant cut diamonds...)
My ring is a SIX-stone. There is even a picture of it photo-copied onto this report. Very definitely SIX diamonds, all in a row, all the same size.
Oddly... they got the carat-weight right (.90 ct total weight) which would be accurate for six diamonds that are all .15 cts. But even in the section under "Diamonds" (separate from the description of the mounting) it says "Quantity: five".
So... I am frustrated. And I feel stupid because I'm nervous to call, because I've never done this before and I don't want to sound like an idiot. But I know I need to have the proper value established before I can insure my rings.
Does anyone have any experience with this??
Thank you!!
I have a dilemma and need some advice...
I have never insured a piece of jewelry before. My new ring is the first piece I've ever owned that is worth enough that it wouldn't be covered under my home owner's policy. My insurance agent told me I needed to have the rings appraised before they could be insured. We plan to insure them for replacement value.
So, last week, as soon as my rings were finished, my jeweler (Greenlake) sent them to the appraiser that that they use. This is an independent appraiser, not one who works for them. I paid $150 to have both of my new rings appraised, and I never spoke to the appraiser. I got the rings shipped to me, then yesterday the appraisal report arrived in the mail. It is a very official document, and the appraiser appears to have very solid credentials.
It is directly stated that the purpose of the appraisal is for insurance purposes, and to determine "replacement value" for the rings should something happen to them. It states that "Replacement cost, new, is the cost necessary to replace the item being appraised with new items of like kind, quality and utility. This definition assumes that an exact substitute can be found for the property being appraised."
Here's the problem...
The appraisal for my E-ring came back with a "Retail replacement cost, New" of over $6,000 less than what I just paid for it!
As a matter of fact... The assumed "value" of the ring came back $1000 less than what I paid for the diamond alone!
And so, obviously, there is NO WAY I could replace my ring for the amount of money they are saying it's worth.
This is what I think happened, and I don't know how to address it...
In the description of my ring it calls my diamond a "Cushion Brilliant", and it gives all of the specs for my stone. The problem is that my stone is not JUST a cushion brilliant, it is an AVC (August Vintage Cushion), which most of you know is a proprietary cut that is only sold by one manufacturer and is a LOT more expensive than a regular "cushion brilliant". When I did a James Allen search for a cushion diamond of my size, color and clarity... the results came back with prices that were close to HALF of what I paid for my AVC. ($8k-ish for the JA stones, my AVC was over $15k)
So, I think the appraiser (who is an Independent Certified Gemologist Appraiser (AGS), and a Graduate Gemologist (GIA) ) is appraising my ring based on the current prices for "average" cushion-cut diamonds.
How do I tell her... "Hey, you got this wrong. My ring is a "special" cut, which I did a lot of research on and paid more for intentionally because it was what I wanted. And so for a true "replacement value" I need at least another $8k tacked onto this number!"
She is the professional. I have about 5 minutes of "internet knowledge" surrounding diamond cuts and quality. She is a gemologist! Is she just going to laugh at me??
Is an AVC really no different that any other "cushion brilliant" when it comes to insurance appraisals? All I know is I can't replace my ring for the value they gave me.
Oh... and one more thing...
The appraisal for my second ring (the wedding band) came back fairly accurately... except for one small detail... The description says under "Mounting"... "Style: The ring is a five stone band style that features five Round Brilliant cut diamonds...)
My ring is a SIX-stone. There is even a picture of it photo-copied onto this report. Very definitely SIX diamonds, all in a row, all the same size.
Oddly... they got the carat-weight right (.90 ct total weight) which would be accurate for six diamonds that are all .15 cts. But even in the section under "Diamonds" (separate from the description of the mounting) it says "Quantity: five".
So... I am frustrated. And I feel stupid because I'm nervous to call, because I've never done this before and I don't want to sound like an idiot. But I know I need to have the proper value established before I can insure my rings.
Does anyone have any experience with this??
Thank you!!