cnkav
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 335
I agree - totally the hottie of the European Princes. Def. the cutest still available!Date: 11/17/2007 11:34:18 AM
Author: UCLABelle
How cute is Prince Carl Philip!!!!
Cool! I''ll try to see if I can find a photo of her wearing it.Date: 11/17/2007 12:41:32 PM
Author: DiamanteBlu
I just got notice of the Sotheby''s Magnificent Jewels catalog for the NYC auction being on line and I found the following:
AMETHYST AND DIAMOND NECKLACE, CIRCA 1900
The foliate garlands decorated with 5 hexagonal amethysts set as swing centers within circular wreaths, alternating with pear-shaped scrolls, set with 13 old European-cut diamonds weighing approximately 8.50 carats, 69 old European-cut diamonds weighing approximately 10.00 carats and numerous smaller old-mine and rose-cut diamonds weighing approximately 5.00 carats, mounted in silver and gold, length 17 inches, 4 diamonds missing. Together with a wood box of octagonal shape stamped on the lid: The Property of Her Majesty The Late Queen Alexandra.
PROVENANCE
Sotheby''s London, March 24, 1988, lot 188. A note following the description states that the necklace was purchased from Wartski in 1958 as part of the collection of jewels of Queen Alexandra.
EXHIBITED
Tiaras, The Victoria and Albert Museum, London, March 21-July 14, 2002.
LITERATURE AND REFERENCES
Geoffrey C. Munn, Tiaras: A History of Splendour, pl. 96, p. 117. The present necklace, when supported on a frame, may also be worn as a tiara.
CATALOGUE NOTE
Alexandra of Denmark (1844-1925) was Princess of Wales from 1863 until 1901 after which she became Queen Consort to Edward VII of the United Kingdom and also Empress of India. After the death of her Edward VII in 1910, she became the Queen Mother as both queen and the mother of the reigning monarch George V.
LadyA, please help me with this one, if you will? I''ve been looking for two days now for info on this brooch as I don''t feel it''s Albert''s brooch. The reason is that Albert''s brooch was/is crown property to be worn by the Monarch, which Princess Elizabeth wasn''t at the time the first pic was taken.Date: 11/18/2007 3:22:52 AM
Author: LadyAmythyst69
The Queen and Prince Philip posed for this photo on their honeymoon 60 years ago. The Queen''s necklace is a wedding gift from her father George VI and the booch is a huge sapphire. It is known as the ''Albert brooch'' because it was a wedding gift from Prince Albert to Queen Victoria.
You know what - I think you are right. I totally misspoke when I called it THE Albert Brooch. I should have said that it is simply a brooch that is thought to have been given by Prince Albert to Queen Victoria as a wedding present. It does look like a sapphire cluster brooch and there are more and smaller diamonds around the edge. I don''t have any more info on it thatn that unfortunately & I don''t think I have seen an upclose picture of it on it is own.Date: 11/19/2007 8:37:40 AM
Author: susi
LadyA, please help me with this one, if you will? I''ve been looking for two days now for info on this brooch as I don''t feel it''s Albert''s brooch. The reason is that Albert''s brooch was/is crown property to be worn by the Monarch, which Princess Elizabeth wasn''t at the time the first pic was taken.Date: 11/18/2007 3:22:52 AM
Author: LadyAmythyst69
The Queen and Prince Philip posed for this photo on their honeymoon 60 years ago. The Queen''s necklace is a wedding gift from her father George VI and the booch is a huge sapphire. It is known as the ''Albert brooch'' because it was a wedding gift from Prince Albert to Queen Victoria.
Perhaps her Mum let her borrow the piece for her honeymoon ( The King and Queen did present Princess E with the Crown Pearls as a ''wedding gift'' even tho Princess E was not the Monarch....sooooo anything is possible ) but, alll this said, somewhere in the back of my memory there is a sapphire brooch composed of multi sapphire stones surrounded by diamonds. Like a cluster of sapphires with diamonds around it and the pic above seems to me to be showing this brooch.
I remember reading that Queen Elizabeth, after the King''s death, of course passed this Albert''s brooch as crown property to her daughter, the new Queen but QE also retained an almost identical brooch for her own use. Also read that some time later another brooch very similar to these came on the market and The Queen bought it for Princess Anne. So there are at least two other very similar brooches to ''Albert''s Brooch'' in the Royal family.
But, I''m stumped on the brooch in the picture. Is there, was there a cluster sapphire brooch surrounded by diamonds? Or does it only reside in my mind
Now, that would make sense! The brooch Princess Elizabeth wore in her honeymoon pic and in the 60th anniversary pic DOES look like a chrysanthemum!Date: 11/19/2007 2:47:34 PM
Author: LadyAmythyst69
Ok - found out some info on the brooch. It is known as the 'Sapphire Chrysanthemum Brooch'. It is in the shape of a chrysanthemum. I'll have to search my photos to see if I can find one of the Queen wearing it. I hope I have one because I don't think she wears it too often.
I wasn''t able to find a photo of Queen Alexandra wearing this necklace - but I did find this one of Kelly Johnson (Don Johnson''s wife) wearing the necklace. She is related to the Getty family who are the current owners of the necklace so presumbly she borrowed it from them.Date: 11/17/2007 12:41:32 PM
Author: DiamanteBlu
I just got notice of the Sotheby''s Magnificent Jewels catalog for the NYC auction being on line and I found the following:
AMETHYST AND DIAMOND NECKLACE, CIRCA 1900
The foliate garlands decorated with 5 hexagonal amethysts set as swing centers within circular wreaths, alternating with pear-shaped scrolls, set with 13 old European-cut diamonds weighing approximately 8.50 carats, 69 old European-cut diamonds weighing approximately 10.00 carats and numerous smaller old-mine and rose-cut diamonds weighing approximately 5.00 carats, mounted in silver and gold, length 17 inches, 4 diamonds missing. Together with a wood box of octagonal shape stamped on the lid: The Property of Her Majesty The Late Queen Alexandra.
PROVENANCE
Sotheby''s London, March 24, 1988, lot 188. A note following the description states that the necklace was purchased from Wartski in 1958 as part of the collection of jewels of Queen Alexandra.
EXHIBITED
Tiaras, The Victoria and Albert Museum, London, March 21-July 14, 2002.
LITERATURE AND REFERENCES
Geoffrey C. Munn, Tiaras: A History of Splendour, pl. 96, p. 117. The present necklace, when supported on a frame, may also be worn as a tiara.
CATALOGUE NOTE
Alexandra of Denmark (1844-1925) was Princess of Wales from 1863 until 1901 after which she became Queen Consort to Edward VII of the United Kingdom and also Empress of India. After the death of her Edward VII in 1910, she became the Queen Mother as both queen and the mother of the reigning monarch George V.
I have tons of info on the Albert Brooch. I''ll get together something on it with lots of pictures of the Queen wearing it. Not until after Thanksgiving though probably - guests coming over for dinner and of course I''ve come down with a cold!!!Date: 11/20/2007 11:32:24 AM
Author: surfgirl
Lady A, is there any info on the sapphire in that amazing brooch?! I''m guessing it''s a gen-yoo-ine Kashmiri sapphire with that stunning, hypnotic royal blue color..wow! And those surrounding old cuts aren''t too shabby either!