prince.of.preslav
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 4,860
Date: 2/4/2009 6:45:12 AM
Author: Imdanny
There were so many rumors about Edward's private life. I am glad that he put them all to rest when he got married.
I have a question for the forum. Why does Camilla wear so many pieces that Diana never wore? Just what is the meaning behind that?
Is that because older royal women always wear bigger pieces? Is it because Diana did not want to wear the pieces Camilla wears? Is it because the Queen did not allow Diana to wear certain pieces?
I have thought about this quite a lot and have thought of no satisfactory answer.
Thank you.
That's an interesting question, Imdanny! I've asked myself the same question many times.
If you look at pictures of Camilla you'll see that most of the pieces were previously in possession of the late Queen Mother. Such jewels are: The Boucheron Honeycomb tiara, the 5 row diamond necklace, the diamond riviera and a great amount of brooches. When the Queen Mum passed, the current Queen got the bulk(if not all) including her mother's private jewels. It's strange that the Queen gave the Duchess these peaces when we know that the Queen Mother didn't like Camilla at all.
The Delhi Durbar tiara is one of the other jewels worn by the Duchess of Cornwall. It was created for Qween Mary to wear it at the Delhi Durbar.
Most of those peaces are really big (specialy the tiaras) and IMO aren't easy to wear and as you suggested they look better wen worn by an older woman. The late Princess of Wales prefered more simple peaces, she also had 2 tiaras, and some big and fine sapphires. We don't have to forget that unlike her rival, Princess Diana wasn't fond of brooches.
Whatever the reason is both women look great in what they have/were loaned.
P.S. I remember reading in another forum that Mrs. Greville was a godparent of Camilla's mother so maybe that's why she got her jewels (The Boucheron Honeycomb tiara and the 5 row diamond necklace).