- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 8,237
I like the stone a lot. The setting reminds me of a slug though....
I'll have to recommend it to my daughter, a UC Santa Cruz Banana SlugI like the stone a lot. The setting reminds me of a slug though....
Agree and +1, I like it for it’s quirkinesses! Not for me personally, but then again if I have that kind of budget I might just go for it.Are we seeing a pendulum swing, back away from the delicacy and refinement of Edwardian platinum and more toward jewels which express substantial, strong personality.... dare I say it, Defiance, Power and/or Authority? Taffin and Hemmerle both embody the ‘next level’ look of boldness.
I think Henri Dunay deserves partial credit too (see pic below). Dunay just never broke through to being ‘cool’ in the same way. It seems like Dunay gave equal balance to the setting and the stone, and typically took the pieces very seriously. They’re about being lush. Not terribly inspiring.
In contrast, Taffin and Hemmerle seem to put more importance on the stone, and create the setting to be less visually weighted. Lighter, more irreverent, and possibly even temporary. What could be cooler than having a Pop Art painting casually tilted up against a wall of ‘serious’ landscape art? I mean, the finery that fills mansions can be so stuffy, right? These Taffin ceramic pieces remind me of the work of Michael Craig-Martin at Chatsworth.
(Edited to add another comment: it might be interesting to consider that maybe, being so accustomed for so long to a state of extreme wealth could cause a level of boredom only cured by eccentricity in expression. Perhaps the best adjective to describe Taffin’s style is Eccentric!)
ps - please someone just holler when Art Nouveau becomes trendy again in the cycle of fashion! Maybe then I can have ten minutes of being cool. Please. I’m begging. Just, like, I mean, ten minutes.
pps - Yeah. Ok. I know. Not gonna happen. (sigh)
I know! I can't wait to see what she does for #4!Her first two e-rings were rather boring, so at least this is a change of pace.
I was thinking the same thing!I know! I can't wait to see what she does for #4!
ugly setting
Not a fan. I dont like brown (it doesn't like me either so there's no hard feelings). Plus, the setting just looks weird to me. I feel like they could have done a better job of flattering the diamond.
I think they mean it is a Type IIa stone, therefore have very few Nitrogen Vacancies or other Vacancies within the crystal structure, if my limited understanding is correct!What exactly is a type 2A stone?
Oh, hell yeah, I would! A bright white halo can make anything pop.
thanks for that infoI think they mean it is a Type IIa stone, therefore have very few Nitrogen Vacancies or other Vacancies within the crystal structure, if my limited understanding is correct!
They are quite rare in nature AIUI, something like under 2% of all stones?
Maybe slugs will, too.The good part is, now brown diamonds will be in fashion
Maybe slugs will, too.
Lol!
#TeamSlug
Ah thank you. Is this something one can see? Or a mind thing?I think they mean it is a Type IIa stone, therefore have very few Nitrogen Vacancies or other Vacancies within the crystal structure, if my limited understanding is correct!
They are quite rare in nature AIUI, something like under 2% of all stones?
definitely in fashion I am surrounded by them. I live near the campusMaybe slugs will, too.
Lol!
#TeamSlug
#TeamEscargot
I believe there is some discussion around Type IIa seeming 'clearer' but I think I might also be confusing things... lolAh thank you. Is this something one can see? Or a mind thing?
Puh-leaze! #TeamAcorn#TeamEscargot