Re: Selecting a diamond for this James Allen swirl halo sett
Yes Niel, I think it is the ASET, it just looks more symmetrical and sharper, but as you mentioned they both look the same according to the gemologist, so that shouldn't worry me, thanks for the reminder. I guess sometimes you look into so many tiny details you forget the big picture.
Cooks
Niel|1402012326|3687352 said:cooks|1402010348|3687326 said:JulieN|1402002943|3687238 said:I like 1. It is a 3 grade jump for less than $100
Hi Julie, thanks for the recommendation, yes I keep going back and forth between #1 and 3. After adding the discounts, #1 is turning out to be $100 cheaper than #3 even though as you said its a 3 grade jump. I am not sure about how the flourescence will look on the #3 so keep turning back to #1.
According to the gemologist, both of them are exactly the same in brilliance and fire. I have till tomorrow to decide, so still thinking.
Cooks.
May I ask what's pulling you to the G then? Is it just the aset? If the gemologist said they perform the same, the E has better color and clarity, and is cheaper... Seems like a no brainer.
To your question about fluorescence, there is nothing wrong withcfluor in general. Its something you just have to be concerned with if it's strong because some strong fluor stones can look hazy. It's rare but it happens. Faint though, that's nothing to worry about! Probabaly won't ever notice it.
Yes Niel, I think it is the ASET, it just looks more symmetrical and sharper, but as you mentioned they both look the same according to the gemologist, so that shouldn't worry me, thanks for the reminder. I guess sometimes you look into so many tiny details you forget the big picture.
Cooks