Hi Phoenix,
My opinion seems to be in the minority here, and you appear to have already made up your mind from a few posts back. But here goes anyway:
I voted to buy the bracelet for the following reasons:
1. US$16K is a lot of money in absolute value but it might not be a lot in relative terms too.
2. I won't buy a bracelet with VG diamonds sight unseen or only seen once under jewelry store lightings. However, you've seen this bracelet a few times under normal lighting conditions and you love it. So you know the performance is "mind-clean" irl.
3. This is a diamond forum and cut is king here. In a ring with only lone diamond or even a few diamonds, yes. In earrings, yes. In a bracelet where I pay retail, yes. But you aren't paying retail in this case and the performance is VG (not ideal/excellent), so I don't mind VG diamond-bracelet. I don't scrutinise my tennis bracelet as much as my ring, so I'm ok with VG cut diamonds so long as they're sparkly, and in your case huge, so I see no reason not to get this bracelet. Having said that, while I can't see my pendant and earrings, I want true H&A in those diamonds as there're fewer diamonds and I need ideal cuts to ensure performance. But a bracelet is made up of so many diamonds, hence I don't mind non-ideal cuts, but still must be VG cut so that the sparkle is still there. Put it this way, VG cut bracelet gives 80% sparkle as compared to 100% sparkle from ideal cut bracelet. But the size of the VG diamonds are huge and it's a continuous sparkle of 25 diamonds, can the human eye really tell the difference in this case?
4. Not a reason but sometimes I'd think in this way too: If you know you'd spend US$16k anyway, would you rather get this bracelet or a birkin and a few scarves/CDCs or whatever other items on your wishlist?
My opinion seems to be in the minority here, and you appear to have already made up your mind from a few posts back. But here goes anyway:
I voted to buy the bracelet for the following reasons:
1. US$16K is a lot of money in absolute value but it might not be a lot in relative terms too.
2. I won't buy a bracelet with VG diamonds sight unseen or only seen once under jewelry store lightings. However, you've seen this bracelet a few times under normal lighting conditions and you love it. So you know the performance is "mind-clean" irl.
3. This is a diamond forum and cut is king here. In a ring with only lone diamond or even a few diamonds, yes. In earrings, yes. In a bracelet where I pay retail, yes. But you aren't paying retail in this case and the performance is VG (not ideal/excellent), so I don't mind VG diamond-bracelet. I don't scrutinise my tennis bracelet as much as my ring, so I'm ok with VG cut diamonds so long as they're sparkly, and in your case huge, so I see no reason not to get this bracelet. Having said that, while I can't see my pendant and earrings, I want true H&A in those diamonds as there're fewer diamonds and I need ideal cuts to ensure performance. But a bracelet is made up of so many diamonds, hence I don't mind non-ideal cuts, but still must be VG cut so that the sparkle is still there. Put it this way, VG cut bracelet gives 80% sparkle as compared to 100% sparkle from ideal cut bracelet. But the size of the VG diamonds are huge and it's a continuous sparkle of 25 diamonds, can the human eye really tell the difference in this case?
4. Not a reason but sometimes I'd think in this way too: If you know you'd spend US$16k anyway, would you rather get this bracelet or a birkin and a few scarves/CDCs or whatever other items on your wishlist?