packrat
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 10,614
I'm trying to understand what the drawings are showing. It appears to me that #1 and #3 are the same except #1 has a gold piece under the head. #2 and #4 will sit lower than #1 or #3, since the head goes down to the finger. The only difference between #2 and #4 is how the side arches meet the hoop of the ring, with #4 looking a bit more filled in to me. I'm curious if I'm missing something here.packrat|1301179026|2880865 said:Got sketches from Chris at myheartmonster this morning for my round yellow chrysoberyl ring. 1 and 2 are my favorites, and I'm fairly certain I'm going w/#1. Wanted to show them b/c it's fun to see the different stages and I'm excited!
o.k., are you looking at the bottom of the shank, where 3 and 4 are curved on the bottom, and 1 and 2 are flat? In that case, I definitely prefer #3, but then I should admit that my e-ring has that exact shape. It fits nicely along the palm of the hand, and the euro shank does help with spinning issues.packrat|1301268098|2881407 said:3 and 4 are a little more blocky, 1 and 2 are a little bit more tapered, but yeah, that's pretty much it. Slight differences is all.
packrat|1301275878|2881500 said:Thanks PT--2 is awful close..I've gone back and forth a few times.
FG, nope, I didn't even notice that at all and I've stared at them for a long time, deciding. It's like one of those brain teasers where one picture is slightly different than the other and you have to pick out the differences. I never would've caught on to that if you'd not pointed it out. I'll ask her about it. I wonder if the more tapered would still spin??