shape
carat
color
clarity

Step cut shallow, why don''t they cut more?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

purrfectpear

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
4,079
So we started to threadjack the other topic when we got to discussing shallow step cut diamonds.

Diagem, Storm and RockDiamond mentioned that you could get a gorgeous looking step cut (we happened to be talking about EC, but I''m guessing it would be true for Asscher?) diamond at 50% depth.

I did a little net research and found sites that gave generally accepted depths for EC no lower than low 60''s and only one that said you could go as low as 53%. Then I looked through at least a hundred virtual inventory spec dimensions and the lowest EC I found was higher than 60%. I found nothing in the 50''s at all, much less 50%.

Here''s the part I don''t understand;

If a 50% depth EC can produce a sweet diamond, and a 50% depth will obviously produce a diamond that at 1 ct. will probably have the spread of close to 1.5 ct., then why are cutters routinely cutting to 65% to 68% average? Why not cut more shallow diamonds? Wouldn''t consumers prefer to buy a diamond that looked larger?

Karl can you model one at 50% so I can see how that works?
 
Hmmmm, interesting. The 50% example you modeled was fugly and dark though. Who knew? The 46% still looked pretty
1.gif


So basically it''s just that they would be too expensive to cut? Couldn''t you just cut more of them out of rough since they''re shallow? Like 3 shallow stones instead of 2 deeper ones, or doesn''t it work like that?
 
It''s important to remember that the shape of the rough diamond determines the best course of action- and the resultant polished stone.
It would make no sense at all to polish a diamond to 50% if it plots out to 60%
So, it''s like an accident of nature when the rough diamond is a sliver- a thin piece that could never make a nice round diamond.
Trilliants are generally cut from very shallow rough - again, cutters of trilliants have to seek out very specific shaped rough diamonds to make the trills. Since trilliants are a specialty, those cutters generally search for that type of rough.
Shallow Emerald or other step cut- is not a specialty unto itself, therefore harder to find
 
here is a 48.4% ec 10% CH 60% table.

484ECjs.jpg
 
48.4% aset

ec484aset.jpg
 
I completely agree that shallow step cuts and even radiant and modified cushions can result in a remarkable diamond. As posted earlier, I was searching for a great radiant and settled on a shallow cut (55%).... I can''t find anything online even close to 55%. Most are in the 62-70% range. Anyway, I love the 55% rad from Harry Winston... Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyzRRuY4oFI
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top