Aoife
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2010
- Messages
- 1,779
Aoife|1305255678|2920352 said:Isn't that Asscher beautiful? Unfortunately, it's not mine, but one day I have to get an Asscher from Jeff. My spinel will be a few weeks out, and will be a round for the ring project I'm doing with my daughters and one of my sisters.
Aoife|1305257044|2920365 said:It was probably more me being dim than you not being clear! Yes, it is from the same parcel. Interesting really, because Jeff said all the colors have been so consistent. I almost went with the mint garnet, instead, but decided that the spinel fit into the parameters of the project better. When is your spinel going to be ready?
TL|1305128640|2918536 said:One should note that pinkish reds command a higher price per carat (all else being equal) than orangey reds.
Harriet|1305682127|2924451 said:TL|1305128640|2918536 said:One should note that pinkish reds command a higher price per carat (all else being equal) than orangey reds.
That may be true of the Mahenge material, but is not necessarily true of the Burmese reds. Try pricing a "flame" spinel.
Harriet|1305683978|2924468 said:Tone, for one.
Harriet|1305686568|2924497 said:TL,
I'll try my best.The Mahenges are an extremely saturated pink that approach red. The Burmese, on the other hand, are a darker red. To prevent them from looking like garnets, a secondary orange or pink is required. A "flame" is a Burmese-red with enough orange that it looks like a glowing ember. Hence, the preference for a pink secondary (if one chooses to distinguish pink from red) in a Mahenge spinel and the preference for orange in the Burmese material. Hope this helps.
AGBF|1305690668|2924554 said:Harriet|1305686568|2924497 said:TL,
I'll try my best.The Mahenges are an extremely saturated pink that approach red. The Burmese, on the other hand, are a darker red. To prevent them from looking like garnets, a secondary orange or pink is required. A "flame" is a Burmese-red with enough orange that it looks like a glowing ember. Hence, the preference for a pink secondary (if one chooses to distinguish pink from red) in a Mahenge spinel and the preference for orange in the Burmese material. Hope this helps.
I am not sure what would constitute a threadjack of this thread, so I am not going to apologize for one! I want to congratulate bright ice on her purchase, which I will be very interested to see when it arrives! I also want to say that while I understand why Burmese spinels might be more valuable when more orange-toned (they tend, in general, to be more purple than the Vietnamese orange hued stones, after all), I still do not understand why the Mahenge stones would be more valuable when pinker. Sorry, Harriet.
Deb, dullard
![]()
AGBF|1305690668|2924554 said:Harriet|1305686568|2924497 said:TL,
I'll try my best.The Mahenges are an extremely saturated pink that approach red. The Burmese, on the other hand, are a darker red. To prevent them from looking like garnets, a secondary orange or pink is required. A "flame" is a Burmese-red with enough orange that it looks like a glowing ember. Hence, the preference for a pink secondary (if one chooses to distinguish pink from red) in a Mahenge spinel and the preference for orange in the Burmese material. Hope this helps.
I am not sure what would constitute a threadjack of this thread, so I am not going to apologize for one! I want to congratulate bright ice on her purchase, which I will be very interested to see when it arrives! I also want to say that while I understand why Burmese spinels might be more valuable when more orange-toned (they tend, in general, to be more purple than the Vietnamese orange hued stones, after all), I still do not understand why the Mahenge stones would be more valuable when pinker. Sorry, Harriet.
Deb, dullard
![]()
Chrono|1305719585|2924685 said:These days, I am seeing more Mahenge spinels with an orange secondary.
bright ice|1305749074|2925032 said:So, what do you all think is a fair price for this particular stone if all holds true for it's description?
LovingDiamonds|1305749357|2925037 said:bright ice|1305749074|2925032 said:So, what do you all think is a fair price for this particular stone if all holds true for it's description?
The problem for me is that while this is a very pretty stone, the description doesn't match the photos. The description says pure red but I see a lot of orange in the photos. IF it is pure red with no orange then it will be worth much more than an orangeish red. However, beauty/love is in the eye of the beholder. You obviously felt that the price you paid was right so don't worry about it now. It's more important that the gem leaps out of the package and you are bowled over by it. If that happens then it's priceless. If it slinks out of the package and you go "oh, ummm, not sure" then you may have paid too much. That's how I assess value and whether I've got a good deal or not!
bright ice|1305749803|2925041 said:LovingDiamonds|1305749357|2925037 said:bright ice|1305749074|2925032 said:So, what do you all think is a fair price for this particular stone if all holds true for it's description?
The problem for me is that while this is a very pretty stone, the description doesn't match the photos. The description says pure red but I see a lot of orange in the photos. IF it is pure red with no orange then it will be worth much more than an orangeish red. However, beauty/love is in the eye of the beholder. You obviously felt that the price you paid was right so don't worry about it now. It's more important that the gem leaps out of the package and you are bowled over by it. If that happens then it's priceless. If it slinks out of the package and you go "oh, ummm, not sure" then you may have paid too much. That's how I assess value and whether I've got a good deal or not!
Thank you LovingDiamonds, you are right. I will certainly have to judge once in hand. In this photo, it looks RED
TL|1305750470|2925058 said:BrightIce, I will differ with LD a little bit in the fact that if you're bowled over when you see it, it may still not be worth the price paid. When I first started collecting, I was bowled over with stones that I wouldn't even consider today. I think the reason it's important to ask lots of questions and opinions on PS and elsewhere, is that people that have been collecting a while, and have seen fine quality, can help you to asses if you did pay a fair price. If when you get it, and you post photos, perhaps we can help you with that. I wouldn't be so nitpicky but this stone was expensive, and you are new to colored gems (if not, please correct me if I'm wrong). Therefore, better safe than sorry. In the end, it is also your choice to dismiss opinions if you really love the stone, but they are opinions, and you can take them for what they're worth to you.![]()