Dreamer_D
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Messages
- 27,505
Re: The Official TTC Thread!
Hmmm.... I think that since you did not really get clear confirmation with a reliable test that you should make a mental note of that experience but not worry one little bit about it. Here is an article from the New England Journal of Medicine that I found really interesting when I was reading up on miscarriage recently: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199906103402304 If you had a faint faint positive in that stange cycle, maybe it indicated a late implantation attempt, which would suggest that the conceptus was not viable anyways, according to the article (i.e., not an issue with you, since you have had 2 pregnancies with earlier implantation). More likely I wonder if it was a evap line though. Also, I had a cycle like you described once, even took a pregnancy test Had all the signs of ovulation on CD 13, and despite a very consistent 10 day LP, did not get my period until CD 27. I suspect that I did not ovulate when I thought and it was instead delayed a couple days despite the signs suggesting it happened on CD 13. So it really could go either way. So I say dobn't borrow trouble. Even if it was a chemical, it would not matter clinically unless you experience another clear mc (I believe three is the point where random chance is less likely to explain it), which I am sure will not happen
Blenheim|1292299596|2796290 said:There is something that has been bugging me, and I was just wanting another take on it. (Dreamer?) Since having George, my luteal phases have consistently been 11 days long (or less, earlier on). I haven't been temping, but I get tons of EWCM and a high, open cervix, which all goes away within a couple of hours of me feeling ovulation pain, and so I feel as certain as I can be about ovulation dates without temping or ovulation tests. Not this last cycle, but the cycle before that, I took a pregnancy test on 12 dpo when my period was a day late. No 2nd line within 3 minutes or so, at which point I was called away by a certain toddler trying to get into trouble, and when I came back 10-15 minutes later, there was a faint faint line. DH could see the line, and so I know that it was not in my head. I know that you are supposed to read it within 10 minutes, so we decided it was a "maybe" and that I would test in a few more days if AF still wasn't there. I was doing a better job at being relaxed about things that cycle -- I got my BFP at 10 dpo this cycle, ha. AF came at 15 dpo and was a couple days longer than usual, and so I never ended up taking that second test. Does this sound like a chemical pg, or just like a wonky cycle? At the time I had dismissed it as an ambiguous who-really-knows, and figured that so many pregnancies end in miscarriage before women even know that they're pregnant that it didn't really matter one way or another, but after this definite miscarriage I am wondering. In retrospect, I should have taken another test at the time and read it within time limits to know for sure. If we have any other issues, I want to be able to give a doctor an accurate history. Although, do doctors care about chemical pregnancies or just about clinical pregnancies?
Hmmm.... I think that since you did not really get clear confirmation with a reliable test that you should make a mental note of that experience but not worry one little bit about it. Here is an article from the New England Journal of Medicine that I found really interesting when I was reading up on miscarriage recently: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199906103402304 If you had a faint faint positive in that stange cycle, maybe it indicated a late implantation attempt, which would suggest that the conceptus was not viable anyways, according to the article (i.e., not an issue with you, since you have had 2 pregnancies with earlier implantation). More likely I wonder if it was a evap line though. Also, I had a cycle like you described once, even took a pregnancy test Had all the signs of ovulation on CD 13, and despite a very consistent 10 day LP, did not get my period until CD 27. I suspect that I did not ovulate when I thought and it was instead delayed a couple days despite the signs suggesting it happened on CD 13. So it really could go either way. So I say dobn't borrow trouble. Even if it was a chemical, it would not matter clinically unless you experience another clear mc (I believe three is the point where random chance is less likely to explain it), which I am sure will not happen