steph72276
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2005
- Messages
- 4,212
Date: 11/23/2008 9:47:11 AM
Author: Sabine
Thanks girls! I''m starting to get really excited/nervous! DH can definitely see a line now, but he is still trying to not get his hopes up! I can''t WAIT till tomorrow morning to test again!
Date: 11/23/2008 10:25:34 AM
Author: fisherofmengirly
You know, if someone could come up with a test that gives NO faint lines, but still gives the results at such a small level of HCG, they'd be my hero.
Isn't it that the digital requires a level of 50, or am I mis-remembering things?
Hmm, that makes sense. But I''d still like something that tells me without a doubt (even if I''m carrying the thing around in the backyard looking for the *right light* from the sun) that I''m preggo.Date: 11/23/2008 10:28:22 AM
Author: neatfreak
Date: 11/23/2008 10:25:34 AM
Author: fisherofmengirly
You know, if someone could come up with a test that gives NO faint lines, but still gives the results at such a small level of HCG, they''d be my hero.
Isn''t it that the digital requires a level of 50, or am I mis-remembering things?
The problem with a super super low-threshold test (whether it''s digital or not) is that we naturally have some HCG in our bodies, so the lower you go with the threshold the less reliable the test is. AND not to mention the fact that these tests are not calibrated to be good ONLY at 50 or 25 miu. Each batch can be a bit different, the number on the package is only an upper bound. So you might get a batch of ''25 miu'' sensitivity tests that could give you a faint positive reading super low because the quality control just isn''t there.
That''s why the digitals and most tests usually are down to about 50 because no woman really should have that much in their bodies unless they are preggers...
Date: 11/23/2008 10:41:05 AM
Author: fisherofmengirly
Date: 11/23/2008 10:28:22 AM
Author: neatfreak
Date: 11/23/2008 10:25:34 AM
Author: fisherofmengirly
You know, if someone could come up with a test that gives NO faint lines, but still gives the results at such a small level of HCG, they''d be my hero.
Isn''t it that the digital requires a level of 50, or am I mis-remembering things?
The problem with a super super low-threshold test (whether it''s digital or not) is that we naturally have some HCG in our bodies, so the lower you go with the threshold the less reliable the test is. AND not to mention the fact that these tests are not calibrated to be good ONLY at 50 or 25 miu. Each batch can be a bit different, the number on the package is only an upper bound. So you might get a batch of ''25 miu'' sensitivity tests that could give you a faint positive reading super low because the quality control just isn''t there.
That''s why the digitals and most tests usually are down to about 50 because no woman really should have that much in their bodies unless they are preggers...
Hmm, that makes sense. But I''d still like something that tells me without a doubt (even if I''m carrying the thing around in the backyard looking for the *right light* from the sun) that I''m preggo.
![]()