rollingringqueen
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 21
I think the top view is pretty. Not seeing a whole lot of metal but the image is a bit blurry. What does the profile look like?
Just setting. The stone in this picture is a CZ for display purposes only.Are you asking for opinions/experience on the setting or both the setting and the stone in the picture?
If you go to @rollingringqueen other thread she shows a profile photo.
I've not owned anything by them, so I don't know how well the pave is done or what quality melee they use. Does your jeweler carry Sylvie? I have had a Sylvie ring in the past that I thought was decently made. I think your stone fits in the setting nicely though. I'm not dismissing Gabriel & Co but have you looked at Simon G or Beverly K?
Oh thank you for the research!!!I just did a search of PS for you, @rollingringqueen . Gabriel & Co. ring owners seem to have been very happy through the years -- with one exception: those who selected 4181:
https://www.gabrielny.com/engagement-ring/ER4181W44JJ
PSers stopped suggesting this particular setting about 5 years ago (and ID Jewelry was declining to order it) because there were complaints about pave stones falling out of the thin shank.
But the one you're considering (pretty profile!) doesn't have that potential problem : - )