Three to chose from

[customjoe]

Measurements: 6.58 - 6.61 x 4.03 mm
Carat Weight: 1.06 carat
Color Grade: J
Clarity Grade: VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
PROPORTIONS

Depth: 61.1%
Table: 56%
Crown Angle: 32.0°
Crown Height: 14.0%
Pavilion Angle: 41.4°
Pavilion Depth: 44.0%
Star Length: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted (3.5%)
Culet: None
FINISH

Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: None
COMMENTS

Pinpoints are not shown.

ROUND BRILLIANT

Measurements: 6.11 - 6.14 x 3.63 mm
Carat Weight: 0.82 carat
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: SI1
Cut Grade: Excellent
PROPORTIONS

Depth: 59.2%
Table: 59%
Crown Angle: 33.0°
Crown Height: 13.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.8°
Pavilion Depth: 43.0%
Star Length: 50%
Lower Half: 75%
Girdle: Thin to Medium, Faceted (3.0%)
Culet: None
FINISH

Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: Faint
CLARITY CHARACTERISTICS

Twinning Wisp

ROUND BRILLIANT

Measurements: 5.99 - 6.02 x 3.62 mm
Carat Weight: 0.80 carat
Color Grade: H
Clarity Grade: VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
PROPORTIONS

Depth: 60.2%
Table: 59%
Crown Angle: 33.0°
Crown Height: 13.5%
Pavilion Angle: 41.0°
Pavilion Depth: 43.0%
Star Length: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted (3.5%)
Culet: None
FINISH

Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: None
CLARITY CHARACTERISTICS

Crystal, Cloud

 

[JulieN]

#3 is probably first choice but it is the smallest.

What did the gemologist say about #1?

 

[customjoe]

Diamond 1519191 (1.06crt J VS2) is our gemologist's favorite based on its great fire, brilliance, and scintillation and overall beauty. Its performance balances nicely throughout the diamond and faces completely eye clean. It possesses an excellent cut and a true "J" color. As you would expect, it also appears a little larger than your other options.

Diamond 1546818 (0.82crt G SI1) has great light performance as well and is our gemologist's second favorite option. It offers a true "G" color and also appears eye clean to the average eye. Diamond 1491144 (0.80crt H VS2) also has great light performance, but it isn't as consistent as your other options. It faces eye clean and has a true "H" color.

While you cannot go wrong with any of these options, diamond 1519191 is your best and overall most beautiful diamond. I believe you'll find it to be beautiful in any setting and that you'll be very pleased with it when you first see it. Please take a moment to review this information and let me know if you have any additional questions. I have extended your hold on these diamonds for an additional 24 hours while you consider your options. I've copied my colleagues in the gemological department and one of them will be reaching out to your within 24 hours to see if you need any assistance in finalizing a purchase. After that time we will release them back to our inventory.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I think you can do better than these. Their top choice has a 32 crown angle???

 

[JulieN]

I think the J is a good choice, then, from the gemologist's review.

The first IS is the .8 H, the second is the J, and the third is the G, is that right?

 

[justginger]

I think you can do better than these. Their top choice has a 32 crown angle???

Agreed. Their first choice has a 2.4 HCA. Unless it's a bargain, I'd skip it.

The other two score 1.0-1.1. I personally don't like tables that are the same size as the depth, so that would rule out the G for me.

Honestly, I think you can find better. Can you post your budget and preferences so we can have a look for other possibilities?

 

[customjoe]

That is correct.. the first is H the secound is J and the third is G

 

[customjoe]

Budget is around $4,500.00. Would like it to have fire, brilliance, and scintillation and overall beauty, consistant light performance and the best cut for the money.

 

[Deucer]

I think you can do better than these. Their top choice has a 32 crown angle???

Agreed. Their first choice has a 2.4 HCA. Unless it's a bargain, I'd skip it.

The other two score 1.0-1.1. I personally don't like tables that are the same size as the depth, so that would rule out the G for me.

Honestly, I think you can find better. Can you post your budget and preferences so we can have a look for other possibilities?

I'm pretty new, but I thought that an idealscope image trumped HCA... is it the score of the image that's bad?