- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,864
I am curious to understand what the general view on the forum is regarding trade member participation. I consider pricescope primarily a place for consumers to share their understanding and experiences about products and companies. In this way visitors can get unbiased feedback and recommendations from real customers like themselves.
So, too much participation from trade members might detract from that making the forum feel overly ‘commercial’. On the other hand, visitors are also coming for technical information that experts in the trade can provide. And having trade members willing to participate, produce educational content, and answer questions, is seen as a good thing by many.
I guess the question is where that balance lies.
Whiteflash has been a fairly active participant for a long time. We feel there are significant benefits for companies willing to devote some resources to participating here. For one thing, the commentary on the forum about products and policies helps us to understand better what the educated consumer is expecting from their merchants, so we consider pricescope to be a ‘focus group’ of sorts helping us to improve our performance.
It is my personal opinion that the forum would likewise benefit from an increased and wider range of trade involvement. But I may be wrong about that.
I imagine that some visitors can be put off by seeing vendors posting in threads where active shopping is taking place – even if the vendor is abiding by the forum rules. I wonder if visitors ever feel like they are being surveilled by the vendors they are considering or working with, rather than feeling like this is a place to get anonymized and unvarnished peer review of those very same vendors.
What are your thoughts on the role of trades people, how much and what kind of participation is ideal, and if you think pricescope would be better off with more or less vendor participation (or if it is currently about right)?
I will hang up and listen.
So, too much participation from trade members might detract from that making the forum feel overly ‘commercial’. On the other hand, visitors are also coming for technical information that experts in the trade can provide. And having trade members willing to participate, produce educational content, and answer questions, is seen as a good thing by many.
I guess the question is where that balance lies.
Whiteflash has been a fairly active participant for a long time. We feel there are significant benefits for companies willing to devote some resources to participating here. For one thing, the commentary on the forum about products and policies helps us to understand better what the educated consumer is expecting from their merchants, so we consider pricescope to be a ‘focus group’ of sorts helping us to improve our performance.
It is my personal opinion that the forum would likewise benefit from an increased and wider range of trade involvement. But I may be wrong about that.
I imagine that some visitors can be put off by seeing vendors posting in threads where active shopping is taking place – even if the vendor is abiding by the forum rules. I wonder if visitors ever feel like they are being surveilled by the vendors they are considering or working with, rather than feeling like this is a place to get anonymized and unvarnished peer review of those very same vendors.
What are your thoughts on the role of trades people, how much and what kind of participation is ideal, and if you think pricescope would be better off with more or less vendor participation (or if it is currently about right)?
I will hang up and listen.