- Joined
- Aug 5, 2010
- Messages
- 12,874
Chrono|1383142194|3547432 said:the use of "honey" and "sweetheart" bothers me more.![]()
Weren't you known as "Chrono-dude" or "Mr. Chrono" by a poster for a while there? I remember it was pretty funny...
Chrono|1383142194|3547432 said:the use of "honey" and "sweetheart" bothers me more.![]()
Chrono|1383151866|3547554 said:Dude's too "chummy" but I don't mind Mr. Chrono at all, other than it sounding a bit too formal.![]()
Chrono|1383142194|3547432 said:Guess I'm not as sensitive as others; the use of "honey" and "sweetheart" bothers me more.
Gene,
Going off a tangent here since I think the answer is quite clear for gems in the $1k price range. Would you still have the same opinion if the item is $1000/ct? $5000/ct?
Here's an interesting question. As a cutter, we are always faced with compromises when cutting a stone. One is often weight. So the question is, if you had a choice of a stone to be cut and yield 10 cts for $100 per ct or $1000 total, or the same stone cut, but the weight would be 8 cts and the price $125 per ct for a total of $1000. Which would you take. Now the face up size would be exactly the same, but the 10 ct stone would have excess weight in the belly and maybe a keel pavilion, where the 8 ct stone wouldn't, and would have a nicer cut and performance.