SweetJimmy
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 15
Hello,
I have two appraisals for the new E-Ring I gave to my now fiance. The first appraisal was commissioned by the vendor (this was an internet bought diamond and ring) by an "independent" appraiser in NYC. This was a service that was included by the vendor as part of my purchase.
Of course, to verify the stone and to have my own appraisal done I commissioned an appraiser in my hometown and under the scrutiny of my own eye to do an appraisal.
Here's some details about the appraisals. The first appraisal done in NYC gives the ring a replacement value of $11,000. The Appraisal is not very detailed and comprises of a credit card sized "Gem ID Card" that includes Diamond weight, shape, color, clarity, GIA Certificate # and diamond information on the side stones of the pave style setting and picture of the entire ring. No cut information was provided on the "Gem ID Card." It is not signed by anyone.
The second appraisal, commissioned by myself in my hometown, gives the ring a replacement value of $14,500. The Appraisal is more detailed and comprises of a full size document (8.5" x 11" paper document) that includes Diamond weight, shape, measurements, clarity, color, AGA proportions (2A), Depth %, Table %, Girdle Size, GIA Certificate #, copy of GIA Certificate, information on side stones and setting and picture of entire ring. The document is signed by the appraiser.
The dilemma is whether I should submit the appraisal from NYC or the appraisal done in hometown. The ring cost me ~$6,000. I got a good deal as the Appraiser said I paid under "wholesale" as she was checking her Rap Sheet prices. Of course, these prices are not necessarily representative of "wholesale" prices, but let's just say that I could replace this ring at a conservative estimate of $7,000. Now at first thought, the $11,000 appraisal would make more sense because it would lower my annual premium while still covering me on replacement. However, the second appraisal seems much more professional, thorough and complete especially regarding the AGA cut grade. It would increase my annual premium though by $36/year based on Jeweler's Mutual price quote. But it could "potentially" save me from getting screwed in the event I had to make a claim for replacement. I suppose it also factors in potential inflation in diamond prices in the future as well. I am not too worried about this though given the high appraisal values of both vs. actual cost.
So I ask for the opinion of those more experienced than me. What would you do? Do I need to worry about Jeweler's Mutual screwing me on a claim because of a less detailed appraisal? And finally, which appraisal would you send in?
Thanks,
SJ
I have two appraisals for the new E-Ring I gave to my now fiance. The first appraisal was commissioned by the vendor (this was an internet bought diamond and ring) by an "independent" appraiser in NYC. This was a service that was included by the vendor as part of my purchase.
Of course, to verify the stone and to have my own appraisal done I commissioned an appraiser in my hometown and under the scrutiny of my own eye to do an appraisal.
Here's some details about the appraisals. The first appraisal done in NYC gives the ring a replacement value of $11,000. The Appraisal is not very detailed and comprises of a credit card sized "Gem ID Card" that includes Diamond weight, shape, color, clarity, GIA Certificate # and diamond information on the side stones of the pave style setting and picture of the entire ring. No cut information was provided on the "Gem ID Card." It is not signed by anyone.
The second appraisal, commissioned by myself in my hometown, gives the ring a replacement value of $14,500. The Appraisal is more detailed and comprises of a full size document (8.5" x 11" paper document) that includes Diamond weight, shape, measurements, clarity, color, AGA proportions (2A), Depth %, Table %, Girdle Size, GIA Certificate #, copy of GIA Certificate, information on side stones and setting and picture of entire ring. The document is signed by the appraiser.
The dilemma is whether I should submit the appraisal from NYC or the appraisal done in hometown. The ring cost me ~$6,000. I got a good deal as the Appraiser said I paid under "wholesale" as she was checking her Rap Sheet prices. Of course, these prices are not necessarily representative of "wholesale" prices, but let's just say that I could replace this ring at a conservative estimate of $7,000. Now at first thought, the $11,000 appraisal would make more sense because it would lower my annual premium while still covering me on replacement. However, the second appraisal seems much more professional, thorough and complete especially regarding the AGA cut grade. It would increase my annual premium though by $36/year based on Jeweler's Mutual price quote. But it could "potentially" save me from getting screwed in the event I had to make a claim for replacement. I suppose it also factors in potential inflation in diamond prices in the future as well. I am not too worried about this though given the high appraisal values of both vs. actual cost.
So I ask for the opinion of those more experienced than me. What would you do? Do I need to worry about Jeweler's Mutual screwing me on a claim because of a less detailed appraisal? And finally, which appraisal would you send in?
Thanks,
SJ