Lulie
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 342
Honestly, option number 3 scares me more than SF living costs.
SF It has seaside beach, less rainy days in a year, no humidity, lots of outdoor activity, friendlier people, lower unemployment rate, big on higher education and research, a lot of billionaires within the city= jobs.
I think Chicago is a bit more globally connected with much more business activity, cheaper living costs by 25%, brutal winters, high collar crime bugs me.
Food and Art are equally good.
Sports: Chicago has it all [my opinion]
Both cities are crowded and most certainly have personalities; you want to make sure it's a good fit!
SF It has seaside beach, less rainy days in a year, no humidity, lots of outdoor activity, friendlier people, lower unemployment rate, big on higher education and research, a lot of billionaires within the city= jobs.
I think Chicago is a bit more globally connected with much more business activity, cheaper living costs by 25%, brutal winters, high collar crime bugs me.
Food and Art are equally good.
Sports: Chicago has it all [my opinion]
Both cities are crowded and most certainly have personalities; you want to make sure it's a good fit!