MeganShannon11
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 252
Can you link to them?
Are the stones actual ACA's, or virtual inventory?
I have them in 0.25 ctw. Would it be helpful to see pics of those? I can put them next to my new 1.4 ctw ACAs.
Four-Prong Diamond Basket Earrings--Ready Set To Go | 1353
Four-Prong Diamond Basket Earrings - Ready Set To Go. Earrings that hold your diamonds like a precious treasure. | 1353www.whiteflash.com
I'm in touch with them trying to find that out. They aren't ACAs and they aren't certified. I don't think I have a huge issue with that at 1/2 carat each, but I really just want to find out what the cut is like.
Can you clarify? What do you mean by "they aren't certified?" If they are sold by WF, they are certified. They might not be ACA but they have at least GIA report.
Yes, very helpful! I’m also curious how you would personally compare them.
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.youtube.com
Here’s a short video. I hope it works. I’ve enjoyed having the 0.25s for years (0.12 each). They are very sparkly and a nice, modest every day size. I may hand them down to my daughter at some point. Personally I don’t think I would pay for ACAs at that size. A matter of personal preference, but for me I would need to be at around .6 or greater ctw before it would be worth it.
So helpful! Thanks so much. This is what I’m debating as I am looking at 1 ctw so .50ish each. If I don’t go with the pre-sets, I might look at individual Expert Selection stones.
@MeganShannon11 I have a pair of the pre-sets in 0.66ctw that I bought pre-loved from another PS-er, and I LOVE them. I'll try to get a photo later if I can. They're super white and absolutely eye clean. If upgrading and "Super Ideal" aren't a primary driver for you, I think they're a solid option.
You can really see the difference in color - the presets are probably H whereas the ACAs are K in yellow gold.
At 1ctw and up, I'd definitely choose ACAs. They won't cost that much more than expert selection. In fact, I have pairs of ACA studs smaller than that to give my girls later on.
It looks like I would have to settle for about .80 ctw versus 1 ctw to do that, so just debating if it’s worth it in smaller stones...
It looks like I would have to settle for about .80 ctw versus 1 ctw to do that, so just debating if it’s worth it in smaller stones...
Have you looked at their Expert Selection or Premium Select? A bit cheaper than ACA but still eligible for a trade-up. Diamond shrinkage is real and you might want to upgrade in the future, otherwise you would be stuck with the .80ctw (especially if you already doubting the .80ctw size).
Wow-looks like a lot of ACA diamonds I/J .40 range got snapped up this past weekend! Is Rose Gold still your top choice for metal?
Here’s a .423 ct versus a .503 for comparison. While the J VS1 ACA is (4.80 x 4.82 x 2.97) is $921, the .503 ct J VS2 ACA (5.07 x 5.12 x 3.13) is $1396.
I put the dims in the diamond database so you have a side by side view. While I can see a slight difference, it doesn’t seem like the .503 ct is worth a 52% up charge.
If you like the .423 ct, would you consider buying it and waiting for a match to come in? The beauty of Whiteflash seems to be the upgrade policy. Seems like buying in the .42 ish range will get to beautiful earrings that you can easily upgrade in the future...
(Full disclosure-I don’t currently own any super ideal diamonds, but for my next project I would like to build my own 5 stone ring with .40 carat ACAs)
Thanks so much for doing that! No, I’m looking to set them in a white metal: probably platinum. I’m not so sure about a J. Was thinking more along the lines of H/I. But, can you buy one if you see one in your range and have them hold it?
Hey @Texas Leaguer can you provide some insight here? Would appreciate it a bunch.
@sledge,
Thank you for pointing me to this thread. Upon reviewing our stud listings we did discover an error. The color and clarity are listed in the title (H-I Si), and are supposed to also appear in the jewelry details table lower on the page. In the case of the 4 prong style that info is missing. We are fixing that as we speak.
We also have the option of designating a cut quality level in the details section and would be interested to hear what the community thinks. In the past we have described cut quality, but in ways that have led to some confusion.
So here's an overall description of our pre-set studs. They are gemologically H-I Si, and with nice cut quality. (Since we are known for cut quality we have to be fussy about this aspect, but they are not held to the same technical standard as our in-house certified diamonds). We inspect them for color and clarity and for brightness and viusal match. They are really nice commercial quality diamonds - not the quality offered by low price leaders. Becca's description cited above is a pretty good one.
So here's the question: If we added a field to the jewelry details section indicating "Cut Quality - Very Good" would this be helpful? Would it be fair and not confusing?