Sithathoriunet
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 1,686
Sithathoriunet|1291171703|2783685 said:RissaLou,RissaLou|1291162871|2783503 said:Pandora|1291120973|2782599 said:Looking at the photos of her with her kids it makes me so angry that as a woman who obviously adored her children instead of being with them and trying to provide some kind of normal life for them, she was running around with ghastly people like Dodi. Her sons really paid for that and I feel so bad for them.
I definitely think everybody is entitled to their own feelings. Me personally, I look at photos like that and it shows me how much she truly adored her children and she did seem to spend great deal of time with her boys. To my understanding most couples have date nights and sadly enough on one of those nights she was in a tragic car accident. Especially for a single mom to judged for dating is especially difficult. People look at you poorly for doing things for your own emotional well being. I'm sure her boys just wanted her to be happy, and thank goodness they were not all out together. But who are any of us to judge unless we spent time in her shoes, really to judge anybody without knowing them personally seems a little harsh. Again these are just my feelings, everybody is welcome to their own opinions.
Yes, I'm with you. Dodi made Diana happy. Her boys still adore her, she obviously did something right! For, her sons to adore her, and to keep her in their lives to this day, it proves that she not only spent time with them, but she made them feel loved, and important and special to her. For such a woman to be more openly normal and loving with her boys was a break in royal tradition, as the queen's upbringing of her children was more traditional and emotions were not shown. Diana even got in trouble on countless occasions for breaking with her schedule to take time with her boys, or her friends. She was determined to have time to take the boys to school functions, to participate in them herself, to vacation with them, and to just hang out with them, and her staff faught her on that many many times, they wanted her to act more like the princess, and stick to her royal duties and schedule. But Diana would fight back, and change her schedule to make time for her boys. When William was beaned and had to go to the hospital for stitches and a concussion, Diana stayed with him in hospital, while Charles came by for a short visit en route somewhere else. Diana would not leave Wills' side. This was typical, as Diana was all for her boys, they were her 'only joy in life' as were her own words. And then there was Dodi.
Dodi was wonderful for her, and her boys, he brought her joy, something she desperately needed in her life. He was with her when she needed him. And that is wonderful.
The thing about Diana is that she hung out with people weather others approved or not, "ghastly people" like those with aids or leprocy, or gay people, all people who are just people like you and I, and were shunned for stupid reasons. Diana brought love to them, for she was a light that shone all around this world. And to call Dodi "ghastly" for whatever reason, is insulting, to Diana, and so to her sons. After all, one could easily throw that insult at someone else, currently married to Diana's ex husband. Diana's choice to love those others would not, and to touch others who many would not. She judged no one on race, religion nor status, she had a light she shared with everyone. God love her. Diana was Queen of Hearts.
Pandora|1291204979|2783957 said:Sithathoriunet|1291171703|2783685 said:RissaLou,RissaLou|1291162871|2783503 said:Pandora|1291120973|2782599 said:Looking at the photos of her with her kids it makes me so angry that as a woman who obviously adored her children instead of being with them and trying to provide some kind of normal life for them, she was running around with ghastly people like Dodi. Her sons really paid for that and I feel so bad for them.
I definitely think everybody is entitled to their own feelings. Me personally, I look at photos like that and it shows me how much she truly adored her children and she did seem to spend great deal of time with her boys. To my understanding most couples have date nights and sadly enough on one of those nights she was in a tragic car accident. Especially for a single mom to judged for dating is especially difficult. People look at you poorly for doing things for your own emotional well being. I'm sure her boys just wanted her to be happy, and thank goodness they were not all out together. But who are any of us to judge unless we spent time in her shoes, really to judge anybody without knowing them personally seems a little harsh. Again these are just my feelings, everybody is welcome to their own opinions.
Yes, I'm with you. Dodi made Diana happy. Her boys still adore her, she obviously did something right! For, her sons to adore her, and to keep her in their lives to this day, it proves that she not only spent time with them, but she made them feel loved, and important and special to her. For such a woman to be more openly normal and loving with her boys was a break in royal tradition, as the queen's upbringing of her children was more traditional and emotions were not shown. Diana even got in trouble on countless occasions for breaking with her schedule to take time with her boys, or her friends. She was determined to have time to take the boys to school functions, to participate in them herself, to vacation with them, and to just hang out with them, and her staff faught her on that many many times, they wanted her to act more like the princess, and stick to her royal duties and schedule. But Diana would fight back, and change her schedule to make time for her boys. When William was beaned and had to go to the hospital for stitches and a concussion, Diana stayed with him in hospital, while Charles came by for a short visit en route somewhere else. Diana would not leave Wills' side. This was typical, as Diana was all for her boys, they were her 'only joy in life' as were her own words. And then there was Dodi.
Dodi was wonderful for her, and her boys, he brought her joy, something she desperately needed in her life. He was with her when she needed him. And that is wonderful.
The thing about Diana is that she hung out with people weather others approved or not, "ghastly people" like those with aids or leprocy, or gay people, all people who are just people like you and I, and were shunned for stupid reasons. Diana brought love to them, for she was a light that shone all around this world. And to call Dodi "ghastly" for whatever reason, is insulting, to Diana, and so to her sons. After all, one could easily throw that insult at someone else, currently married to Diana's ex husband. Diana's choice to love those others would not, and to touch others who many would not. She judged no one on race, religion nor status, she had a light she shared with everyone. God love her. Diana was Queen of Hearts.
Oh please, you talk like you knew her in person when all you have is what was in the gossip magazines.
Diana cared very little for Dodi (who was certainly no gentleman) and was just messing about while on the rebound from a relationship she cared very much about. And that information came from someone who was a close personal friend.
At what point did I ever describe people with illnesses or people who were shunned for physical, mental, racial, sexual reasons as ghastly? I use the term in reference to a man who was known as a complete playboy. Had Diana stayed with him (which she had no intention of doing) and god forbid married the man I can assure you that the British public would not be quite so adoring of her.
My opinion of Diana's choice of bed partner is not an insult to her sons, how totally ridiculous. Many people do call Camilla ghastly - that's up to them.
If you want to pray at the altar of Saint Diana that's fine but don't expect everyone else to worship...
sillyberry|1291235861|2784372 said:RissaLou, I don't mean to speak for Pandora, but I don't think she was really responding to you...
Ok, Pandora,Pandora|1291204979|2783957 said:Sithathoriunet|1291171703|2783685 said:RissaLou,RissaLou|1291162871|2783503 said:Pandora|1291120973|2782599 said:Looking at the photos of her with her kids it makes me so angry that as a woman who obviously adored her children instead of being with them and trying to provide some kind of normal life for them, she was running around with ghastly people like Dodi. Her sons really paid for that and I feel so bad for them.
I definitely think everybody is entitled to their own feelings. Me personally, I look at photos like that and it shows me how much she truly adored her children and she did seem to spend great deal of time with her boys. To my understanding most couples have date nights and sadly enough on one of those nights she was in a tragic car accident. Especially for a single mom to judged for dating is especially difficult. People look at you poorly for doing things for your own emotional well being. I'm sure her boys just wanted her to be happy, and thank goodness they were not all out together. But who are any of us to judge unless we spent time in her shoes, really to judge anybody without knowing them personally seems a little harsh. Again these are just my feelings, everybody is welcome to their own opinions.
Yes, I'm with you. Dodi made Diana happy. Her boys still adore her, she obviously did something right! For, her sons to adore her, and to keep her in their lives to this day, it proves that she not only spent time with them, but she made them feel loved, and important and special to her. For such a woman to be more openly normal and loving with her boys was a break in royal tradition, as the queen's upbringing of her children was more traditional and emotions were not shown. Diana even got in trouble on countless occasions for breaking with her schedule to take time with her boys, or her friends. She was determined to have time to take the boys to school functions, to participate in them herself, to vacation with them, and to just hang out with them, and her staff faught her on that many many times, they wanted her to act more like the princess, and stick to her royal duties and schedule. But Diana would fight back, and change her schedule to make time for her boys. When William was beaned and had to go to the hospital for stitches and a concussion, Diana stayed with him in hospital, while Charles came by for a short visit en route somewhere else. Diana would not leave Wills' side. This was typical, as Diana was all for her boys, they were her 'only joy in life' as were her own words. And then there was Dodi.
Dodi was wonderful for her, and her boys, he brought her joy, something she desperately needed in her life. He was with her when she needed him. And that is wonderful.
The thing about Diana is that she hung out with people weather others approved or not, "ghastly people" like those with aids or leprocy, or gay people, all people who are just people like you and I, and were shunned for stupid reasons. Diana brought love to them, for she was a light that shone all around this world. And to call Dodi "ghastly" for whatever reason, is insulting, to Diana, and so to her sons. After all, one could easily throw that insult at someone else, currently married to Diana's ex husband. Diana's choice to love those others would not, and to touch others who many would not. She judged no one on race, religion nor status, she had a light she shared with everyone. God love her. Diana was Queen of Hearts.
Oh please, you talk like you knew her in person when all you have is what was in the gossip magazines.
Diana cared very little for Dodi (who was certainly no gentleman) and was just messing about while on the rebound from a relationship she cared very much about. And that information came from someone who was a close personal friend.
At what point did I ever describe people with illnesses or people who were shunned for physical, mental, racial, sexual reasons as ghastly? I use the term in reference to a man who was known as a complete playboy. Had Diana stayed with him (which she had no intention of doing) and god forbid married the man I can assure you that the British public would not be quite so adoring of her.
My opinion of Diana's choice of bed partner is not an insult to her sons, how totally ridiculous. Many people do call Camilla ghastly - that's up to them.
If you want to pray at the altar of Saint Diana that's fine but don't expect everyone else to worship...
That's too bad RissaLou,RissaLou|1291247426|2784567 said:sillyberry|1291235861|2784372 said:RissaLou, I don't mean to speak for Pandora, but I don't think she was really responding to you...
Oh, oops, sorry about getting so emotional then. I'm just going to stop posting in this particular thread, it's too stressful
To Kate and William, I hope they have a loving happy marriage and life together, without too many prying eyes, influences, or judgements. All the best!!
And as a side note: may all of us leave this world with our loved ones remembering the best about us instead of our faults, HAPPY HOLLIDAYS
Gee thanks so much Harriet. I am so glad you posted your opinion.Harriet|1291310930|2785210 said:Sithathoriunet,
PS is a public forum. Creating a thread does not entail ownership of it. I think that Pandora has every right to post her feelings about Diana et. al. here.
Incidentally, gemmological theory is not a matter of opinion, as you claim.
Sithathoriunet|1291339089|2785659 said:Gee thanks so much Harriet. I am so glad you posted your opinion.Harriet|1291310930|2785210 said:Sithathoriunet,
PS is a public forum. Creating a thread does not entail ownership of it. I think that Pandora has every right to post her feelings about Diana et. al. here.
Incidentally, gemmological theory is not a matter of opinion, as you claim.
No Harriet,Harriet|1291340124|2785686 said:Sithathoriunet|1291339089|2785659 said:Gee thanks so much Harriet. I am so glad you posted your opinion.Harriet|1291310930|2785210 said:Sithathoriunet,
PS is a public forum. Creating a thread does not entail ownership of it. I think that Pandora has every right to post her feelings about Diana et. al. here.
Incidentally, gemmological theory is not a matter of opinion, as you claim.
If you are referring to my 'opinion' on the basic distinctions between hue, tone and saturation, it is rooted in fact. See, e.g. Schumann's "Gemstones of the World," not snippets from various unacknowledged websites. I am neutral towards Diana et. al., but cannot bear to see people disseminating falsehoods about gems and misleading others.