- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 8,087
Sorry for the long hiatus - it turned into A Very Busy Weekend (in a good way, but, yikes, exhausted).
Thanks, Bright Ice - I love it, and I keep staring at it like a loon everywhere I am. I'm pretty sure the people in the park must have either though I had a compass strapped to my finger, or that I was trying to read my own palm (and getting it wrong, at that).
Thanks, SLG - I love the horizontal French cuts. It's simple, its blingy, it's secure ....
I'm really excited about the possibility of getting a custom piece from VC - I talked to Larry Van Craeynest last week, and should be seeing some sketchs maybe tomorrow. Eeeeeeeeeee! But I guess it really depends on the specific sketches and proportions and finding something that I just Can't Resist - much as I did with the stone. Also, thank you! From a fellow bargain-hunter, I am flattered!!!
Thanks, Yenny! It's the root of the temptation, all right.
Dreamer, this is a very practical set of points that hadn't occurred to me - thanks! I've worn rings on my right-hand before, but they have all been cabs or bezels or both. Excellent advice, and a definite check in the reset column ....
Win win indeed! The setting is apparently a period piece, so no matter what I do with it, I'll definitely try to do it justice - Amy's idea about consigning down below hadn't occurred to me, but now that it's been suggested, I'll definitely either go that route or keep it set with another stone (hm, I have always wanted to see a fishtail prong setting with an asscher - if the kid's setting turns out to be topaz, I might have to explore that option!).
Heheheheh - thanks, BB! I am both flattered and with you: while I can see how people might suggest resetting the stone that's not original to the setting, anyway, I love my e-ring, and it would break my heart to futz with it. Plus, a modern RB in a VC setting would seem ... off to me, somehow. Good point about keeping the oldness, too - my husband said something similar. He scratched his head and said, "But isn't the thing you like the fact that its hand-cut, survived years and years, etc.?" And you're both right! So, since there's not structural damage and I'm going to bezel anyway, the repolish angle is probably falling by the wayside.
Excellent logic, DS, thank you! You articulated the thought process very clearly ....
And you, succinctly!
So, yeah - at this point, waiting with bated breath to see what Mr. Van Craeynest can do with my jumble of ideas. Fingers crossed!
bright ice|1317344344|3029259 said:It's a gorgeous stone whatever you do with it.
Thanks, Bright Ice - I love it, and I keep staring at it like a loon everywhere I am. I'm pretty sure the people in the park must have either though I had a compass strapped to my finger, or that I was trying to read my own palm (and getting it wrong, at that).
slg47 said:love that last setting you posted...that gets my vote!
Thanks, SLG - I love the horizontal French cuts. It's simple, its blingy, it's secure ....
vintagelover229 said:I LOVE the current setting but it would also look great with a colored stone or sold for another lucky woman who'd wear it as an e-ring.
I vote for either SS or VC bezel setting with some french cuts like the one you have picture or like LGK has (it is my DREAM DREAM setting you have LGK and my SO said I could rest it in that and if it didn't cost as much if not more than my entire set I would have considered it. Someday for a smaller RHR I hope to do a sapphire bezel with some french cut side stones but that's YEARS away).
Beautiful ring though and great find!
I'm really excited about the possibility of getting a custom piece from VC - I talked to Larry Van Craeynest last week, and should be seeing some sketchs maybe tomorrow. Eeeeeeeeeee! But I guess it really depends on the specific sketches and proportions and finding something that I just Can't Resist - much as I did with the stone. Also, thank you! From a fellow bargain-hunter, I am flattered!!!
yennyfire said:Yssie|1317336094|3029120 said:Can I vote refurbish and reset? Have Ari polish the girdle - so long as it's not a high risk, then have Van Craeynest work magic with a setting
Not that the current setting isn't very pretty, 'cause it is, but if you have the option VC is just a whole different level of luxury I think! Your stone is GORGEOUS
I'm with Yssie. If you're going to reset it, this is what I'd do. Such a tough call, b/c it's gorgeous as-is!
Thanks, Yenny! It's the root of the temptation, all right.
Dreamer_D said:I don't feel that there are sacred cows in the settings of these older rings, personally. Enough will survive as a record of the times, we don't need all of them.
You asked why I don't like that ring for a RHR... it is mostly practicality, I feel like that type of solitaire, with a stone that large, is just asking to catch on things and be annoying when you dig in a pocket, pick up your kid, run your hand through your hair. All of this assumes you are right handed. I like a RHR to be lower profile, and if not bezel, then set so the shank swoops up to meet the girdle in some way so the whole piece is smoothly integrated more with the hand. Purely functional, which is an important element of esthetics in my book.
Dreamer, this is a very practical set of points that hadn't occurred to me - thanks! I've worn rings on my right-hand before, but they have all been cabs or bezels or both. Excellent advice, and a definite check in the reset column ....
Gypsy said:Dreamer_D|1317441831|3030347 said:I don't feel that there are sacred cows in the settings of these older rings, personally. Enough will survive as a record of the times, we don't need all of them.
Agree. Plus most of the time we re-set them on PS with colored stones... totally in keeping with the era.
And I didn't think that's a true period piece. I thought it was a reproduction too.
I know I personally plan to reset the diamond I bought, or buy an unset but the setting I get will be in keeping with the age of the diamond. And I think Circe's desire for a VC is also in complete keeping with the diamonds history. Plus it will make her love it more and wear it more... so win win!
Win win indeed! The setting is apparently a period piece, so no matter what I do with it, I'll definitely try to do it justice - Amy's idea about consigning down below hadn't occurred to me, but now that it's been suggested, I'll definitely either go that route or keep it set with another stone (hm, I have always wanted to see a fishtail prong setting with an asscher - if the kid's setting turns out to be topaz, I might have to explore that option!).
MrsBettyBoop said:I agree with reset the new/old stone. *I* think it's kinda weird to have something so similar to your e-ring and I would personally kill over dead if you reset your e-ring stone instead. Your e-ring is what made me fall in love with fishtail prongs.
I probably wouldn't polish it or anything either. I think it's purdy as is... keeping the oldness, if that makes any sense.
Heheheheh - thanks, BB! I am both flattered and with you: while I can see how people might suggest resetting the stone that's not original to the setting, anyway, I love my e-ring, and it would break my heart to futz with it. Plus, a modern RB in a VC setting would seem ... off to me, somehow. Good point about keeping the oldness, too - my husband said something similar. He scratched his head and said, "But isn't the thing you like the fact that its hand-cut, survived years and years, etc.?" And you're both right! So, since there's not structural damage and I'm going to bezel anyway, the repolish angle is probably falling by the wayside.
diamondseeker2006 said:After looking at your other thread, I would not keep it in that setting because I think it is too similar to your e-ring setting. Plus I think your e-ring setting looks like better quality and condition. My only qualm would be that I wouldn't want a right hand ring with a larger diamond than my e-ring. So if I had this happy problem, I would reset it and alternate it with my e-ring instead of wearing it as a RHR. I'd do a Van Craeynest, personally, but I am not sure I recall seeing one with a bezel. Maybe once it is out of the setting, it can better be determined if it needs a bezel to protect the girdle. I am often one who is sad to see old rings reset, but I do not love this setting enough to keep it as is. Can't wait to see what you decide!!!
Excellent logic, DS, thank you! You articulated the thought process very clearly ....
Amys Bling said:Reset- salvage the setting and consign it with JbEG!
And you, succinctly!
So, yeah - at this point, waiting with bated breath to see what Mr. Van Craeynest can do with my jumble of ideas. Fingers crossed!