Yay or nay?

[Autumnovember]

Nay but I love how pretty her nails look!

 

[ChloeTheGreat]

Nay. Too much.
It might be a better proportion of she chopped that big stone in half and gave half to me.

 

[Colltee]

Nay. That's gross.

 

[AGSHF]

Hell nay! So to speak.

And here's a reminder of the late great Elizabeth Taylor, who knew how to wear a tremendous stone without it wearing her!

 

[centralsquare]

A big Nay from me. Can she event get her fingers to come together???

 

[asymons412]

I say she wears one as a RHR!

 

[Imdanny]

But Kenny these are only our opinions on someone else's rings. We're not telling them they can't do it.

Having said that, I think it's pretty bad, the band overpowers the other ring (as big as the other ring is!). As a matter of how it looks- to me the band doesn't go with the ring.

 

[Circe]

It bugs me that I can see a color difference between the band and the e-ring. And I hope she does wear them on separate hands eventually ... that does not look comfortable. But, at the end of the day, if it makes her happy? Sure, why not.

 

[Imdanny]

And here's a reminder of the late great Elizabeth Taylor, who knew how to wear a tremendous stone without it wearing her!

1000x yes! What a great picture.

 

[VRBeauty]

Nope.

 

[centralsquare]

It bugs me that I can see a color difference between the band and the e-ring. And I hope she does wear them on separate hands eventually ... that does not look comfortable. But, at the end of the day, if it makes her happy? Sure, why not.

I thought I saw a color difference too, but wasn't sure. Is that just b/c the stones are smaller in the band?

 

[junebug17]

Nay.

 

[risingsun]

Ni, ni!

 

[Gypsy]

Nay. All those lovely step cuts... screaming at being forced to compete with one another like that.

 

[purplesilk]

YES!!!
It suits her showy style.

 

[Colltee]

I didn't twig this is Kim Kardashian (*duh!*). Those rings are rotten. Her engagement ring in itself is awful, it's like the Ron Jeremy of diamond engagement rings. Flaunting a $20 million ring is pretty sad/distasteful. She may as well just get her hand set in carbon and have it polished, it looks stupid, crazy vulgar and rather comical. I'm thinking 3-4 months (max) before the divorce - in fact the whole next 2 years of her life and the poor bugger she married is probably already scripted and in post editing stage at E-online, overseen by Ryan Seacrest.. On the upside, this sort of showbiz/makey-up-land cr*p really make you realise just how lucky, normal and fortunate you are. I feel sorry for them, in 10 years they'll probably all be bankrupt and even more insecure. You don't get anything for nothing, everything has a price and their 'Hollywood' shelf life is very nearing it's sell-by-date. *Getting down off soapbox now*

 

[centralsquare]

it's like the Ron Jeremy of diamond engagement rings

 

[Tuckins1]

It's beautiful, but such big stones/pieces are not my cup of tea.

 

[zoebartlett]

Neither.
Wear, and let wear.

I only get to supervise one person, me.

Okay, that's your standard reply to everything (goes along with "people vary"), but what if you HAD to give a yay or nay answer?

So, what'll it be?

 

[slg47]

on separate hands, sure. together...it just takes away from the engagement ring (which as far as large celebrity rings go, I think is very pretty).

 

[lyra]

Nay, but I'm sure this whole thing is only temporary anway.

Yay for Elizabeth Taylor, she could rock any size diamond! That lady had class.

 

[rosetta]

Neigh.