- Joined
- Oct 15, 2010
- Messages
- 2,191
asschergirl27|1350849412|3289776 said:Frankie, that is STUNNING! Just perfect. Enjoy!
I really hate to hijack this thread, but just a quick question for you. ( I posted in RockyTalky but not sure if you are reading there). I have the Michael B Paris setting and want to purchase an eternity band similar to yours - like your old set. I was just wondering if there was anything wrong with that set, or if you just changed what you wanted for your ring. I would wear a thin spacer too. Just looking for some input before I splurge on the eternity band.
Again, so sorry to ask you here, but not sure if you would see my other thread.
Thank you, and again LOVE your ring! Victor is a true artist.
Phoenix|1350878785|3290004 said:Frankie, I your new ring. The centre stone is bigger, the halo is thinner and more delicate, the struts more curvy and sexy and the stone is set at an optimal height. What's not to love?! I particularly love how the delicate halo makes the larger stone pop and look even larger/ more pronounced! tt's really GORGEOUS!! Victor did good - reeealll good!!
Tell me, has any one of your friends and colleagues noticed you've switched rings? I know us PS'ers would for sure notice the diffrence IRL but wonder if other ppl may have? I personally would for sure do a double-take, ha ha...(I ask because I've been wearing smaller studs, 1.5ct each instead of 2.3ct each; and these smaller ones are much whiter @ F-G instead of J and not one single person, other than my PS friends, has noticed or made any comment, lol).
Also, have you noticed any difference in optical performance of this stone compared to the last one, ie. the higher crown etc...(what Yssie mentioned in yr last thread)?