- Joined
- Aug 14, 2009
- Messages
- 27,420
Re: A hanforging journey - Five-Stone Eight-Prong trellis by
Unfortunately, this is very true, Charmy. I've isolated what I feel are some aesthetic differences from objective issues with quality, and the VC suffers from both the latter and the former. The regions where the trellis wires were soldered into the shank are lumpy, as if the wires were spaced too far for the width of the bar used for the shank; and the various flat and curved areas are visibly uneven and unevenly spaced on both sides of the ring, as are the four regions of triangular engraving. The area under the engraving is rough, and each prong bisects two facets - each sits on an upper girdle facet and the tip extends onto the lower bezel facet, but the tips weren't pushed down onto this flatter facet and so they catch on *everything*. I also noticed that the side-prongs were notched for the adjacent diamonds but the diamonds didn't actually sit in the notches - had I kept the ring I would have sent it back to have this fixed, but I certainly think it shouldn't have been the case to begin with. Unacceptable given the 6k pricetag, all in all. I've learnt a lot.
CharmyPoo|1323640749|3079362 said:All vendors will have pieces that fall short of expectation and their usual quality standard - this also applies to Leon Mege and Steven Kirsch (I can think of examples but won't share them). Add to this that they may believe they have executed their design fully but their design vision can be different from the customer's vision. It's not easy. Honestly, I think buying a diamond is easier than getting it set.
Unfortunately, this is very true, Charmy. I've isolated what I feel are some aesthetic differences from objective issues with quality, and the VC suffers from both the latter and the former. The regions where the trellis wires were soldered into the shank are lumpy, as if the wires were spaced too far for the width of the bar used for the shank; and the various flat and curved areas are visibly uneven and unevenly spaced on both sides of the ring, as are the four regions of triangular engraving. The area under the engraving is rough, and each prong bisects two facets - each sits on an upper girdle facet and the tip extends onto the lower bezel facet, but the tips weren't pushed down onto this flatter facet and so they catch on *everything*. I also noticed that the side-prongs were notched for the adjacent diamonds but the diamonds didn't actually sit in the notches - had I kept the ring I would have sent it back to have this fixed, but I certainly think it shouldn't have been the case to begin with. Unacceptable given the 6k pricetag, all in all. I've learnt a lot.