VividRed
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2018
- Messages
- 799
Pricing at expected replacement cost + margin makes sense - in this market - if competition does the same AND if the margin is fair and relatively stable. It also requires relatively fast turnover. This is an “old trader” strategy and in this day of hightened transparency and information, I don’t think it works well if your inventory is sitting since year. It feels instead like a lame attempt at increasing prices hoping to capitalize on the fact demand is higher. The quality of the inventory has not changed though. It is basically just a margin bump.
That’s just my opinion, of course
I am not saying that AJS did this, but it is not unheard of, and some vendors openly disclose this pricing mechanism